To: LLCF who wrote (60431 ) 12/20/2012 2:37:42 PM From: Peter Dierks 1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588 Well it is true that Romney was a inferior candidate. It is clearly obvious to all rational persons that he would have been a far superior President than the pretender who is squatting in the Whitehouse currently. For that simple reason he received millions of votes that he would otherwise not have gotten. ............................................................................................................ Guy Benson of Townhall.com points out that in last Tuesday’s election, Obama only won by 406,348 votes in 4 states: Florida : 73,858Ohio : 103,481Virginia : 115,910Colorado : 113,099 Those four states, with a collective margin of 406,348 votes for Obama, add up to 69 electoral votes. Had Romney won 407,000 or so additional votes in the right proportion in those states, he would have 275 electoral votes. All four states showed Romney ahead in the days leading up to the election. But on November 6, Romney lost all four states by a substantial margin, all of which have precincts that inexplicably went 99% for Obama, had voter registrations that exceeded their population, and had experienced problems with voting machines. This election was stolen by the Democrats via vote fraud. Despite all the evidence of fraud, the Republican Party has been strangely silent about it. http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/ ............................................................................................................. Don't forget that in Florida one county in Alan West's district had 143,000 of the 79,000 voters voting. That fraud alone was over half of the margin of 'victory' in that state.