Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Guru of the Month Contest -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (13035)	12/21/2012 7:07:15 PM
From: Fiscally Conservative	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17549

Again, U make a good point GZ. I guess its because my belief in the economic system currently employed is more dangerous to our economic future than the intermediate gains generated. The cost of economic stimulus outweighs the gains generated in GDP. Outside of our Federal Reserve Board's policies and their associated expenses with the QE's shouldn't we consider the US Government's expenditures? Those governmental expenditures are like a runaway train that do trickle down with measurable GDP growth although feable, but at a huge cost. They are spending what they do not have. And when they stopped and or slow down it will have a negative impact on GDP. This is what we are now facing. It is not that the economy is nott showing feable growth but instead the effect the impending austerity will have. The street, for now, will party until the street sees austerity.