SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggersh who wrote (42353)12/21/2012 7:41:08 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 221925
 
Oh, no argument... just that we were able to handle a higher tax rate with clinton because the economy was humming along at more than twice the speed... the same tax hike today would kill the economy...

GZ



To: ggersh who wrote (42353)12/21/2012 8:00:12 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 221925
 
Look up Nestor v. Fleming, might be Flemming. Supreme Court ruled decades ago that there are no entitlements. Social Security is just an income tax, nothing more, nothing less. They can cut benefits to zero and there is nothing you can do about it.



To: ggersh who wrote (42353)12/21/2012 11:26:40 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Respond to of 221925
 
I'm not here to argue, but both parties are trying to cut
entitlements which were paid for, that's not an entitlement
in my book.
You are living in the Nile.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News