Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (60613)	12/24/2012 9:34:32 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

The fact remains that nothing is stopping you from paying what you believe is a fair rate but hypocrisy.> That's simply not correct. Doing so would look stupid (to an accountant), cost accountant fees... all sorts of paperwork for self AND probably the goverrnent no doubt... IN FACT they would probably just credit you (me) for next year. I AM planning on not collecting SS when the time comes to help that program... although IMHO it should be means tested. :) You clearly never thought income tax idea through and you're grasping at straws to make me fit into your pre-conceived notion of me... It is not my job to go WAY out of my way to try and pay a certain tax rate.. it is much simpler to just give money to charity... which I do. Again, by your definition of hypocrisy essentially nothing would change because everyone wanting change is a hypocrite in your mind. We see this all the time with those who rail against the "eco-types". All That said... Merry X-MAS and Happy New Years!! Chat next year :)) DAK