SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: simplicity who wrote (697)12/29/2012 6:30:23 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 16547
 
That pic is from Columbia in April

abcnews.go.com



To: simplicity who wrote (697)12/29/2012 6:41:40 PM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
wow! Hillary's recuperative powers are impressive!



To: simplicity who wrote (697)12/29/2012 8:20:37 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 



To: simplicity who wrote (697)12/29/2012 8:21:41 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Hillary has recovered from the Benghazi flu?



To: simplicity who wrote (697)12/30/2012 2:53:58 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama judge: First Amendment for Muslim convict, not for Christian business owner

Obama judge: First Amendment for Muslim convict, not for Christian business owner

via Hobby Lobby Losing First Amendment Battle Once Won by a Muslim Prisoner | Independent Sentinel.

On December 21st, a federal appeals court stuck down Hobby Lobby’s request for an exemption from providing the morning-after and week-after pill in their health insurance plan as mandated by Obamacare (ACA).

A Court of Appeals in Denver, CO ruled against the arts-and-crafts store chain’s belief that the Christian fundamentalist beliefs of its owners should exempt them from that provision.

Beginning January 1, the Green Family, who own the chain, face $1.3 million a day in fines if they do not violate their core religious beliefs and provide the abortifacients.

Hobby Lobby immediately asked the SCOTUS for an emergency injunction. A Supreme Court injunction would have prevented the company from being forced into implementing the mandate temporarily while it appeals the most recent decision to a lower court.

Justice Sotomayor
handles issues arising from the 10th circuit and received the case.

Justice Sotomayor denied the request, ruling that the store owner does not meet the extremely high standards required for a preliminary injunction. She said it is not clear that they need the injunction though the court doesn’t have much experience with similar religious-based claims [Politico]

Justice Sotomayor, however, did have a similar First Amendment experience prior to becoming a Supreme Court Justice in which she showed unusual deference to Muslim inmates when she found in favor of the Ramadan Ruling of 2003
[Laura Ingraham]

In that case, she found that a MUSLIM PRISONER, who was denied Ramadan meals, must be provided with the meals on a feast day even though it was not a religious requirement.

Sotomayor ruled that the inmate’s First Amendment rights were violated because the feast was subjectively important to the inmate’s practice of Islam.
[Ford v. McGinnis]

Lawyers will say the cases are entirely different but they are entirely not.

Fundamental Christians apparently cannot rely on the First Amendment protections but Muslims can.

Hobby Lobby will appeal all the way to the Supreme Court. Hobby Lobby is a faith-based business, represented by the Beckett Fund. A SCOTUS decision in favor of Hobby Lobby is looking bleak.

The government is at war with some religions.


[iframe class="youtube-player" type="text/html" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/k4pL32qQ_3k?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent" style="max-width: 100%;" frameborder="0" height="294" width="468"][/iframe]

Kyle Duncan, who is representing Hobby Lobby on behalf of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, said in a statement posted on the group’s website Thursday that Hobby Lobby doesn’t intend to offer its employees insurance that would cover the drug while its lawsuit is pending. “The company will continue to provide health insurance to all qualified employees,” Duncan said. “To remain true to their faith, it is not their intention, as a company, to pay for abortion-inducing drugs.”

Contact them here.

credit longnshort



To: simplicity who wrote (697)12/31/2012 3:07:33 PM
From: joseffy5 Recommendations  Respond to of 16547
 
Worth repeating:

by simplicity-----

During my surgery recuperation I have been making it a point not to watch very much news (what passes for ‘news’ these days generally results in nothing more than anger and frustration for those of us who know the truth about this administration, and anger and frustration are not conducive to regaining one’s health). So, if I am making erroneous assumptions about the current political situation, please chalk it up to the fact that I’ve been somewhat out of the loop for the past couple of weeks.

I decided to tune into Fox just now and listen to our president’s brief discussion regarding the impending fiscal cliff. This is what I came away with:

(1) I have never (not ever!) witnessed a president give a speech of the gravity that this subject should entail in surroundings such as the one I just witnessed. He walked to the podium amid adoring cheers and applause, as if he were speaking at a campaign rally. His partisan remarks were also interrupted by adoring cheers and applause more times than I can count.

Ronald Reagan would have spoken from his desk in the Oval Office, or from a lone podium, surrounded by American flags. There would have been no ‘fans’ present, and no partisan reaction to his remarks. He would have spoken, unencumbered by a blatantly partisan climate, one-on-one to the American people.

In contrast, this ‘address’ seemed more like a political rant given by Benito Mussolini or Adolf Hitler
rather than a president of the United States.

(2) This president has no interest in avoiding the fiscal cliff (which is primarily of his own making). Following his Cloward-Piven and Saul Alinsky model, crises are not to be avoided. They are to be embraced, even created, as opportunities to inflict more government control, more government regulations, and more taxation on the already oppressed – which is going to be the inevitable final result of this charade.

(3) He closed his remarks by saying, ‘It looks as though I am going to be spending my New Year’s Eve in Washington’, appearing to want the viewers to interpret that as some sort of sacrifice on his part as a result of his dedication to doing what is right for the country he leads (loose use of the word).

This from a man who takes lavish vacations at our expense, and who has virtually ignored his countrymen who are homeless as a result of a natural disaster he promised to respond to effectively and compassionately.

And yet we are supposed to admire him for sham- ‘sacrificing’ his New Year’s Eve in our behalf.

The self-absorbed narcissism is appalling.



To: simplicity who wrote (697)12/31/2012 3:15:13 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 16547
 
Yes, Fascism Has Come to America

Mark Levin recently wrote on his Facebook page: Is the Democrat Party becoming a fascist party?

I’m starting to think the Democrat Party should rename itself the Fascist Party. Its love of an all powerful, centralized government, and contempt for independent, successful individuals, are traits of a fascist mentality.


Yes, of course, we are living through fascist times.

A political regime, usually totalitarian……ideologically based on centralized government……government control of business…… repression of criticism or opposition……a leader cult……and exalting the state…above individual rights.

Sound familiar?

I no longer wonder how so many people who lived during Hitler’s evil reign of terror could have gone along with the unimaginable inhumanity of Naziism. I used to wonder about it. Not anymore.

I see horrifyingly evil “opinions” expressed by fellow Americans every day on Twitter, and in comment sections of blogs. They don’t just disagree with conservatives – they want us to shut up, lose our jobs, be financially ruined, or to drop dead. They actually root for Republicans to die, and when they do die, the ghouls celebrate their deaths. Not just one or two weirdos engage in this behavior – huge packs of them do.

Blogger, SaberPoint writes:

I do not recognize this leftist human scum as fellow citizens, but as traitors, agents of hostile foreign powers and ideologies.

Their hatred of all things conservative is real and unhinged and it’s stoked by a Commander in Chief whose M/O is to divide and conquer, and who never misses an opportunity to demonize his political opposition.

Charging one’s opponents with bad faith is the ultimate political ad hominem. It obviates argument, fact, logic, history. Conservatives resist Obama’s social-democratic, avowedly transformational agenda not just on principle but on empirical grounds, as well — the economic and moral unraveling of Europe’s social-democratic experiment, on display today from Athens to the streets of London.

Obama’s answer? He doesn’t even engage. That’s the point of these ugly accusations of bad faith. They are the equivalent of branding Republicans enemies of the people.



Image via American Power

Many of Obama’s most loyal subjects would volunteer to drive the cattle cars - they would operate the ovens for free.

His minions in the media have spent the last five years ruthlessly race-baiting anyone who disagrees with their precious first black President. No, I won’t call him my President. I didn’t vote for him, and I oppose everything the he stands for. In twenty years, when people wonder what the hell happened to our freedoms, our quality of life – ourdignity – I’ll be able to say, I had nothing to do with it – I fought it every step of the way.

Oh, that’s crazy talk, you say.

Who in their right mind could ever have foreseen a headline like this only four short years ago?: Obama Administration: We Can and Will Force Christians to Act Against Their Faith.

As the mandate now stands, the Greens must begin complying with it on Jan. 1. On Nov. 11, U.S. District Judge Joe Heaton refused to grant a preliminary injunction to stop the mandate from being enforced on the Greens while the court decided their case on its merits. In his ruling on the injunction, Judge Heaton determined that the Greens were not likely to establish they had a right to “free exercise” of religion while operating Hobby Lobby.

‘[T]he court concludes plaintiffs have not established a likelihood of success as to their constitutional claims,” said Judge Heaton. “The corporations lack free exercise rights subject to being violated and, as the challenged statutes/regulations are neutral and of general applicability as contemplated by the constitutional standard, plaintiffs are unlikely to successfully establish a constitutional violation in any event.”

The Greens appealed their request for an injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. A panel of two appeals court judges refused their plea. They then appealed to Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who sits over that circuit, and she declined to reverse the lower courts and issue an injunction.

When Sotomayor ruled against a preliminary injunction on Thursday, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the Greens, issued a statement indicating that the Greens would not start complying with the mandate on Tuesday and that they would continue to pursue their case in federal court.

“Hobby Lobby will continue their appeal before the Tenth Circuit,” said Becket Fund General Counsel Kyle Duncan. “The Supreme Court merely decided not to get involved in the case at this time. It left open the possibility of review after their appeal is completed in the Tenth Circuit. The company will continue to provide health insurance to all qualified employees. To remain true to their faith, it is not their intention, as a company, to pay for abortion-inducing drugs.”

As the nation approaches the much publicized fiscal cliff, it also approaches a moral cliff: Will the Obama administration compel Christians to act against their faith? As of now, the answer seems plain: Starting Tuesday, it will.