Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (82731)	12/31/2012 6:06:20 AM
From: Follies	7 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 119360

Should the police be allowed to have guns? Could a 22 year old steal a gun from their policeman father and gun down 20 people?

To: GST who wrote (82731)	12/31/2012 9:11:50 AM
From: Travis_Bickle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 119360

I'm okay with banning the AR-15, don't see why anyone would want to own one, they are insufficiently lethal.

To: GST who wrote (82731)	12/31/2012 12:17:02 PM
From: yard_man	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 119360

that's fine -- weapons are a problem -- what I don't get is how the clowngress is gonna put the genie back in the bottle -- folks who want new laws limiting access to new guns don't have ANY answer for that. The recent rush to buy isn't going to be fixed with a buy-back or making some additional registration BS -- people will just refuse to cooperate -- and with good reason. Police have already expanded the use of these weapons -- not to mention ATF, FBI, IRS -- and who knows what other federal agencies.