Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The new NFL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (37323)	12/31/2012 9:54:55 AM
From: golfer72	Respond to of 88054

his record in elimination games keeps him out of the great category.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (37323)	12/31/2012 10:27:21 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 88054

" I have to think trading Romo is now a necessity for them. " for who ? Gus Ferotte ? This years draft is week for QBs, most of the 2nd string QBs need to grow. The Skins Kirk Cousins would be good but I don't think the skins will trade him to the cowboys

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (37323)	12/31/2012 10:43:00 AM
From: Bonefish	Respond to of 88054

The question remains. Why were Romo and Sanchez still starting? :.)

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (37323)	12/31/2012 1:01:36 PM
From: Robert F. Newton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 88054

Great is the wrong word for Romo. He was good but far from great. His lack of success in games that manner is downright awful. I like to reserve "great" for the best QB's. McNabb was a good QB but not a great one. In the NFL today, the great ones are Mannings, Brady, Big Ben, Rogers, Brees. They are young QB's who could be great RG3, Luck, etc. I think Romo comes back only for one reason - there is a severe lack of starting QB talent in the NFL. The 2013 draft is very thin at QB as well.