Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Technical Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Beam who wrote (1695)	1/1/2013 12:35:52 PM
From: loantech	Respond to of 14245

Happy New Year Beam, Excellent points that you made and regretfully for the implications the make I agree with them. That post is a keeper and I am doing so now. I only put the one rebuttal up as I had googled what was in building 7 that needed to be "done away with" but time limited this AM so got that link but not what I was looking for. Best regards, Tom

To: Beam who wrote (1695)	1/1/2013 12:36:37 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14245

BTW anything particular on the Bush video or a time for a specific item? TIA.

To: Beam who wrote (1695)	1/1/2013 12:46:07 PM
From: The1Stockman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14245

<"For instance, if one WTC Building 7 support column gave way leading to the total collapse of the building -- wouldn't it have fallen asymmetrically over to the side where the column failed -- following the path of least resistance? Would that one column failure make the whole building fall straight down into it's own footprint at free-fall speed -- in an identical pattern to other buildings purposely brought down with well-placed and timed explosives?"> (Above) ... An "UNDENIABLE TELLING" clue that's been totally ignored by popular media and government officials, which makes them all GUILTY. If you look at the trade center building's they came down exactly in the same-even direction (straight down), ... as if the main beams were purposely blown-up. I find this one interesting, Ive been around both Military and Commercial planes, and this is not a commercial plane.