Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (60851)	1/3/2013 4:19:55 PM
From: pcstel	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

>Fact, you wrote this: ""... no wonder you don't mind paying more, because YOU WON"T HAVE TOO.""< The Fact is, that this is PART of what I wrote. Fact is that you continue to be disingenuous by selectively snipping parts of statements, and then insinuating that I said something different in the parts that you selectively chose to omit.. Like this.. >The bill would raise rates on long-term capital gains and dividends for top-bracket taxpayers to 20% for 2013 from 15% in 2012.>Awww, but dopey bone head "pastel" said my tax rates weren't going up and so I was a hypocrite!?? LOL, guess he was wrong... "surprise".< Where my original statement clearly stated: Ahh! This explains things.. IF IT"S ALL SHORT TERM CAPTIAL GAINS, then you are not in line to pay higher taxes, no wonder you don't mind paying more, because YOU WON"T HAVE TOO. Marginal Rates on SHORT TERM CAPITAL GAINS is not due to increase.. So you chose to omit the fact that I clearly enunciated that my statements related to SHORT TERM CAPITAL GAINS, and you simply attempted interject my statement in a topic of LONG TERM GAINS AND DIVIDENDS. >LOL... "bitter"? I thought it was funny....why is that bitter? I think you're a bit upset.< So you thought that it was funny to be purposefully disruptive and attempt to agitate other board members by playing games to attempt to purposely "upset" board participants? Is that about it? >I mean, this is coming from a person that somehow claims to know I was simply lying about my tax situation and all???< I didn't say you were lying about your tax situation. I said your story kept changing from post to post. You know what they say.. NEVRE CHANGE YOUR STORY.. AS IMPLAUSIBLE AS IT MAY SEEM.. NEVER CHANGE YOUR STORY. You change your story with the direction of the wind. >Essentially that entire post by you was just drivel then??? OK, I admit it... I'm not surprised, and I'm sure no one else is either.> Don't be so sure, but given you self-importance complex, you seem quite comfortable speaking for everyone else.. Never stopped you before.. Speaking of drivel... > I'm sure when you turn on your media to get your scripted marching orders every day you encounter the exact same thing... take out the juicy sentence out and present it... so why so upset? < LOL!! Where did that come from¿¿¿ Now you are mumbling... You sound like a homeless person pushing a shopping cart. >Ahhh, yes... more "self validation"... LOL... can we assume they are your favorite moderators?? You may want to check that out... < No.. maybe you should check it out before you make "wild assumptions".. But why start validating your facts before you make them now? You will find that I have never made a single post on ANY of the boards you are currently banned on.. Sorry.. try again. Of course, that may change when the moderator here finally calls your disruptive behavior here as enough is enough. And so it goes, PCSTEL