SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nanny who wrote (7162)12/3/1997 12:32:00 PM
From: Pierre Panet-Raymond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11098
 
Nanny, testy testy. I think if you were to carefully read my first posting to this board, you would see that while not a bullseye, it comes a lot closer to the mark than Mr. Lutts's.

-The General Motors analogy.(#804)
-Letter # 833-June 1996, he predicts EPS of $0.40. Actual= $0.21.
-Fax dated June 7, 1996, he predicts gross profits from plate sales alone of $75 million by the end of 1997 and eps of $2.50( adjusted for splits). Just a little off I'd say.

I'll stand by my analysis Nanny.



To: Nanny who wrote (7162)12/4/1997 12:32:00 PM
From: Loren  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11098
 
Nanny -

You may be right about PRST's future, and I hope you are, because I'll probably buy the next time PRST gives a buy signal.

However, can I tell you something? It seems to me that you are posting your opinions and ideas in a taunting and arrogant fashion, while at the same time accusing the bears of doing the very same thing!

I subscribe to Cabot's Market Letter, and I'm doing pretty well buying and selling Lutt's picks. I also believe he is a man of integrity. But I don't think he's always right. I agree with Paul and others when they say that Lutts has been way off on his earnings predictions for PRST. Because in truth he has!

So I recommend to you a couple of things:

a. If you want the bears to act nicer, lead by example.
b. Don't confuse the integrity of Lutts with the accuracy of Lutts.
c. When you post, focus on PRST and not the bears.

Loren