Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : 2012 Biotech Charity Contest -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BulbaMan who wrote (466)	1/3/2013 9:26:10 PM
From: Biomaven	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 513

And just to emphasize how strict Bulba is on this, one of my picks got disqualified because it's a Japanese stock that Yahoo didn't pick up, and my proposed replacement stock was PM'ed a little after the deadline and so wasn't accepted (so I went with 11 stocks instead of 12). Peter

To: BulbaMan who wrote (466)	1/3/2013 9:42:02 PM
From: scaram(o)uche	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 513

>> For the record << Yesterday, in a private message..... I was wondering about him myself. I did get a portfolio from a dnajoe, so maybe it’s the same dude.

To: BulbaMan who wrote (466)	1/3/2013 9:45:24 PM
From: scaram(o)uche	Respond to of 513

>> none of the stocks in those 3 portfolios are in my own << Four. I guess. Right? Or? Six? Give me a break. I was not accusing you of picking off picks for your CONTEST portfolio. I was suggesting that you get a view of contest picks for consideration, real life portfolio. You know, like we all used to get, before you added complex, uneeded rules? It was IN THE SPIRIT OF THE CONTEST for all to share ideas at the same time, in the same place.... the contest thread. Now you've got it strangely split between the thread and your email. And why? Because you decided that it would be that way. You bitch about Dew, me, others complaining about the rules? Go back to the ones that nobody ever bitched about! Simple. >> It was always my intention to use the time portfolios were posted, whether on the public board or by PM to me. << Intention? You don't have any choice, for the public board. So your wording relates to PM.