Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : "I STILL own the ban button, buddy" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (1412)	1/5/2013 9:47:04 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2133

Sandusky clearly falls within your definition of a pederast. If we were to go into the prisons and ask the pederast/pedophiles how they think the boys they have raped and abused feel about them you would of course get a bunch of love stories and rationalizations. Very similar to the "no harm no foul" bullshit you are offering here. In the case of Sandusky we have a tried and convicted criminal who was convicted because everyone had plenty to say to his discredit and his immoral behaviour. Of course the real scandal at Penn State was Precisely that so many people knew exactly what Sandusky was doing but remained silent because they were afraid to say anything for various reasons. How much more with your filthy Greek heros? Who is going to have the guts to say anything against the rulers when they have your life and future in their filthy pervert hands? Not many.