SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (881)1/7/2013 12:50:01 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Only an idiot would be unable to see what Obama/Soros is doing.



To: FJB who wrote (881)1/7/2013 3:30:59 PM
From: joseffy3 Recommendations  Respond to of 16547
 
Marine describes death threats for writing ‘No ma’am’ letter

January 7, 2013 By Cheryl Carpenter Klimek
bizpacreview.com

When U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said she would introduce legislation to place a ban on assault weapons, former U.S. Marine Cpl. Joshua Boston did not sit idly by. Instead he penned an open letter to the Senator that has gone viral gaining mass attention.

In response to Boston’s letter, Feinstein released this statement:

“Senator Feinstein respects Cpl. Boston’s service. She has heard from thousands of people — including many gun owners — who support her plan to stop the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of assault weapons and large capacity magazines, strips and drums that hold more than 10 rounds. As Senator Feinstein has said, the legislation will be carefully focused to protect the rights of existing gun owners by exempting hundreds of weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes.”

On Monday, Cpl. Boston spoke out on Fox News about why he wrote the letter. While he said he has received generally positive support, he finds it disturbing that some are “calling for my death because I am member of the NRA.”


RELATED POST:
‘No ma’am’: Letter from U.S. Marine to Dianne Feinstein goes viral



Bob Honiker says:
January 7, 2013 at 12:52 PM
Feinstein is a liar, she was caught on tape supporting a total gun ban. No matter what she gets today she will be back for more tomorrow.


Barry Soetoro the MOSLEM says:
January 7, 2013 at 1:48 PM

That Marine should just tell Senator Feinstein, “Don’t worry, I’m a Mexican Drug Lord, so the government should supply me with weapons.”

If she’s never heard of Obama’s operation Fast+Furious, the Marine should change his story to, “Don’t worry, I’m a Moslem Brotherhood terrorist, and Obama supplies them with weapons funneled thru our Benghazi consulate.”


Owning weapons is great, according to Omoslem — as long as you’re a drug lord, or moslem terrorist. Otraitor only arms likely FOREIGN murderers — not law-abiding citizens.

This is because Obamatollah hates the USA, hates our 2nd Amendment, and believes we are evil and in the wrong, while drug cartels and terrorists are “noble.”





To: FJB who wrote (881)1/8/2013 2:23:24 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 16547
 
Tunisian suspect in Libya attack freed


Associated Press ^ | Jan 8, 11:10 AM EST | BOUAZZA BEN BOUAZZA



To: FJB who wrote (881)1/9/2013 5:55:08 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 16547
 
Pro-jihadist John Brennan to head CIA?

WND ^ | January 9, 2013 | Pamela Geller

Pro-jihadist John Brennan to head CIA? Exclusive: Pamela Geller says 'Jew-hater' Chuck Hagel is disaster for Defense post

by Pamela GellerCould you imagine an even more dangerous pick than Chuck Hagel for secretary of defense?

Under Obama, yes. Worse is always what’s next.

President Barack Obama said Monday that he would nominate former Nebraska Sen. Hagel, a Republican, to be secretary of defense, and his top counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, to head the Central Intelligence Agency. Astonishing. Obama is doing the full monty.

The president’s CIA pick has called jihad a “legitimate tenet of Islam,” arguing that the term “jihadists” should not be used to describe America’s enemies. During a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, John Brennan described violent extremists as victims of “political, economic and social forces,” but said that those plotting attacks on the United States should not be described in “religious terms.”

Brennan speechifies in Arabic and has equated Muslim terrorists with shoplifters. Lawmakers have called for his firing.

Readers of my website AtlasShrugs.com are long familiar with the pro-jihadi thug Brennan. If you recall, during the 2008 presidential election, I ran a number of stories on the breach of Obama’s passport at the Department of State. It bears noting that Brennan – whom Obama first appointed to be assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for by Text-Enhance">homeland security and counterterrorism, in which capacity he made his notorious and incredible pro-terror remarks, some in Arabic no less, about the beauty of jihadwas connected with the tampering with Obama’s passport. He led the investigation into the breach of Obama’s passport records – the mysterious passport Obama traveled to Pakistan on in 1981.

Quid pro quo?

Back in March 2008, State Department employees were found to have tampered with the passport files of Barack Hussein Obama. The State Department launched an investigation into allegations of improper computer access to Obama’s passport records. The investigation was focusing on one employee – a contract worker with a company headed by an adviser to Obama’s presidential campaign ( see details here). We don’t know what was done with the by Text-Enhance">passport information once it was accessed: Was it changed? Was information removed altogether? Almost five years later, we still don’t have any answers.

You will also recall that the key witness in the presidential passport-tampering case was murdered. Shot in the head, in his car, in front of his church.

Obama said at the time that these attempts to “tap into people’s personal records” were “a problem not just for me but for how our government functions.” Laughable, considering how intrusive his administration has been and continues to be in accessing private by Text-Enhance">information.

The one-two punch of Brennan and Hagel is an insult to all free people. In the Senate, Hagel amassed a significant track record as one of a hardline hater of Israel who would not affix his name even to the most innocuous pro-Israel initiative. When all but four senators signed a pro-Israel statement in 2000, Hagel was one of the holdouts. The next year, he was again among the few senators – 11 this time – who refused to add their names to a statement urging George W. Bush not to meet with Yasser Arafat as long as the Palestinian groups under his control continued to pursue violence against Israel. In 2005, Hagel, along with 26 other senators, opposed a call to the Palestinian Authority to disqualify terror groups from participating in elections. And when 12 senators wrote to the European Union in 2006 asking that the EU by Text-Enhance">join the U.S. in classifying Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, Hagel was once again one of the few.

Hagel wasn’t intimidated, and Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t either. In late October 2009, Obama appointed Hagel co-chair of his Intelligence Advisory Board. And in a particularly piquant symbolic move, the appointment was announced at J Street’s first annual conference – by Steve Clemons of George Soros’ New America Foundation. And now Hagel is getting a promotion from his grateful anti-Israel boss.

How is it possible in the 21st century that a Jew-hater like Chuck Hagel would be named secretary of defense and a jihad enthusiast like John Brennan would be tabbed to head up the CIA? One word: Obama.



Read more at wnd.com