SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Smith who wrote (2579)12/3/1997 12:22:00 PM
From: jan_mike  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11708
 
David - I didn't know the company had any influence over these price fluctuations. I keep hearing that they want help in price stabilization and support. If the company isn't doing anything wrong, there shouldn't be any reason for them to worry. I am going to call them for their take. This concept confuses me. Thanks for responding.
Mike



To: David Smith who wrote (2579)12/3/1997 2:32:00 PM
From: RBM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11708
 
David,

I can only speak of what I have seen, but if it is ILLEGAL NAKED short selling, usually the MM's eat burnt toast. IF you know for sure this is going on, then drop the letter and hit them with the names, the company cannot be responsible for naked shorting...MM's are.

Rob

P.S. As Joe said, if its from Canada, were screwed, but on the other hand Joe, the MM's would have to show order flow to the SEC (as if the SEC can't see it already, if they want to see it they will)



To: David Smith who wrote (2579)12/4/1997 8:54:00 AM
From: sweez  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11708
 
Dave if "they come down on the company themselves." That implies
that the company must have some control over MM's or the stock. If this company is Solid and future earning are to prevail on the price. Then how much worse can this be than what shorty is doing now. If were long were long.
Sweez