SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (37501)1/10/2013 1:11:52 PM
From: Little Joe1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
Frankly I don't have the figures but if you want to you can look them up. The fact is CRA is well recognized as a cause of the Real Estate crash. If you don't accept that, I am not sure what to say.
lj



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (37501)1/10/2013 1:23:58 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
remember red lining and Jesse Jackson said Blacks couldn't get loans. the feds force banks to get rid of red lining and give more loans to minorities. Ask any broker on the east coast



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (37501)1/10/2013 11:16:39 PM
From: i-node4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
>> The CRA was passed in 1977 and the RE bubble began after the stock bubble burst in 1999/2000.

The CRA as enacted in the late 70s wasn't the problem because it had no teeth.

In 1995, Bill Clinton expanded the scope of CRA by ordering changes to the regulations thereunder, which essentially required banks to make loans to unqualified borrowers. THAT, more than any other single thing, caused the crash five years ago.

In 2008 BOA had outstanding CRA loans amounting to 7% of its mortgages yet accounting for 30% of its losses.

An argument can be made there were other factors. But any goof who denies there was a role -- and a substantial one -- played by CRA doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.