Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the_big_guy who wrote (30733)	1/14/2013 9:48:10 PM
From: donpat	Respond to of 53574

I looked up the defence counsel - David Porter: mccarthy.ca

To: the_big_guy who wrote (30733)	1/15/2013 6:50:02 AM
From: jaxstraw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

The key point in both cases is that the CEO and CFO "ought to have known" even if they did not know..............From what I understand the defendants were able to prove that they never directly ordered anyone to do anything dishonest. Or they did not know, were fed false information. That is the 'key point' of what you pulled from reading the JBII complaint ? I would have to disagree as far as the JBII side....I know little of the Nortel case. It is extremely apparent that the SEC complaint directly pointed out that Bordynuik knew exactly what he was doing .....and gave several examples and statements from him doing so to several different entities .