Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (97875)	1/16/2013 3:28:17 AM
From: Joseph Silent	1 Recommendation Respond to of 218543

There was no theory given. The empirical evidence you gave showed that you progressed from one set A of ideas to another set B of ideas when you decided A was "wrong". If you insist on using the word theory, then it must be a theory based on the data you gave us. The rest of it is extremely simple. You decided A was wrong based on your reality. Now you sit with B. If you were wrong with A, what guarantee do you have that you are not wrong with B? In true Mq (Muddled quoz :) ) fashion, you managed to bring in "nihilism", "psychoanalysis", "Goedelian", "self-referential" etc. in an attempt to confuse the issue. Do you find confusion and wiki-babble to be an aid to what you peddle for logic? :)