Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (61325)	1/16/2013 2:30:35 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 71588

Terrific quote

To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (61325)	1/16/2013 11:37:19 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 71588

yea, like when the "state" decides to attack a state in the ME because it doesn't like their particular flavour of dictator.... yea... got it. DAK

To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (61325)	1/17/2013 9:35:48 AM
From: Peter Dierks	2 Recommendations Respond to of 71588

That poignantly describes the problem with the current Administration: Since the democratic ruler is insatiable, that ruler will assume more and more power. In the end, the formal Law State will be mere window-dressing for a democratic power- and police-state, characterized by such a mass of statutes, rules, and regulations that not much will be left of the libertarian substance of genuine constitutionalism. It is not as if Republicans are much better. Right now the dominant tone in both parties is for more central power. That is the beauty of the Tea Party. They alone are the voice for limited government.