To: ItsAllCyclical who wrote (29227 ) 1/17/2013 12:15:56 PM From: IngotWeTrust Read Replies (1) | Respond to You wrote (thank you).........yes. That's a BIGGIE! .......that has yet to be determined, esp. considering who they've brought on recently as mining engineer. ......Won't be a problem with NEM, CDE and FROST fighting and biting....does mean dilution, of course. ....think you need to re-look at both those assumptions. Studying the permits and config of the cyanide mill they bought out of bankruptcy might change your darned low recovery percentages. If you knew me in real life, you'd understand the background I base my firm belief in the considered opinion I'm offering here. .......... or flipping them off into subsidiaries as they've already done the Uranium land package they assumed when Alfers snagged this out of BK. Alfers is equally comfortable and has already demonstrated willingness and skill in doing said parsing out of properties, mostly for shares (info and options on the come) modality, not just NSRs. .......No opposition there. Land package needs work is what the drilling opps/program is about. The consolidation of continguous has already occurred. You may be reading "stale land package" commentary from Global Data research, et al? ......short term it is into the 3rd standard div of the 2012 doldrums with the 33% price move in the last 3 days. HOWEVER.....this is pre-2week resource buzz...and is generated by early birds doing their homework, and people who aren't relying upon the Global Data and Reuters analysts for their screening. ........I'm not in this for the long term. I've studied Alfer's patterns. He jumped out of the last one he did this to several years back at $14. 60c to $14 -ish Alfer's threshold bucks...that's MY idea of long term however long that is. -g- ........Not so sure I agree with consigning it to the dustbin of technical breakout only analysis, altho' I'll take THIS tech breakout over the one-day wonder back to 97c several weeks back by a pumper/dumper.
