SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (693637)1/18/2013 2:12:16 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576865
 
"You hardly post on these threads and yet, you think you know me completely. You know what they say about making assumptions.........well it applies to you and your perspective on me."

I don't claim to know you at all. However, you have self-disclosed certain details of your circumstance which I noted in that post. I compared those to my own to demonstrate that YOUR assumptions are 1 untrue and 2 something of a projection. Seems like we've had similar exchanges before where you, not only make crazy untrue assumptions, misrepresentations and applications to my personage but then complain this is what is being done to you. Again I will note, I have stuck to the facts as they are known and made no assumptions (Facts---You: no job ever, no dependants, no visable contribution to society, sheltered lifestyle, expressing lots of concern about what you can get the govt to do, etc ... Me: opposite).

>>>"Simple fact.............as the numbers of guns in this country have grown so has the frequency of these massacres as well as gun violence in our schools and our cities in general. Another simple fact.........the US is the most violent first world country in the world. That makes all of your explanation up above pure and simple BS."

No it doesn't. A correlation does not prove cause and effect. Both things have risen and both have risen for similar reasons (cause), cultural change. In this case we can look at a number of things which have changed. For example, the natural protections of kin in family centered communities which defined our culture for much of our history is not as common as it once was. This puts any isolated individuals at more risk of becoming a victim of violence. That is just one example of something that has changed which could be a cause of greater violence. The shooters in these massacres were not surrounded by a net of protective, caring adults (family, friends, and professions) as they would have been in the not too distant past.

Most of the other gun violence is centered around violent criminals but you don't respond to comments in that regard. Your focus has been all on right wingers who own guns. That doesn't make sense to me. I don't own a gun but I'm real comfortable knowing my conservative neighbors might. I am good to my neighbors and they are good to me. I can't say I feel the same about gangsters on the street, or unseen threats from criminal elements (violent attackers, robbers and such). Why do you care if the right wingers are prepared to protect their homes? Why do you want them in particular disarmed? It doesn't make any sense except when looked at on a foolish partisan destruction level.



To: tejek who wrote (693637)1/18/2013 2:18:08 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1576865
 
Simple fact--as the number of people taking psychiatric drugs in this country have grown so has the frequency of these massacres as well as violence in our schools and our cities in general.