Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul V. who wrote (151642)	1/19/2013 10:14:17 PM
From: Wayners	Respond to of 224845

Not by much and seats in the House and Senate barely moved. The Democrats can't claim a whole hell of lot.

To: Paul V. who wrote (151642)	1/20/2013 8:09:13 AM
From: chartseer	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224845

Not according to history. The party which wins the presidential election loses seats two years later. Especially when the win is a second term.. .

To: Paul V. who wrote (151642)	1/20/2013 10:16:09 AM
From: Sedohr Nod	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224845

Just think, we could have elected a president that actually knows about finance....a man that could manage money better in his sleep than 99.9% of whatever crawls and leaves a slug trail out of D.C. It probably actually matters very little either way, since the man or woman that can break the back of the blobish bureaucracy has not hit the scene yet......and probably never will. The older I get, the more frivolous and futile it seems to "enjoy" life over whatever group of wastrels happens to have the temporary upper hand in Washington.......damned few of them are worth retaining and the ebb and flow of the two headed snake will continue as long as the voters allow it. But enjoy it while you can.....Change will always be popular in politics and it's a real shame that it's rarer than Hope diamonds.