Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (694055)	1/20/2013 12:36:06 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1576434

a private school lie , be still my heart. You ever been to a private school ? your kids ? of course they lie, all the time, esp to the parents

To: combjelly who wrote (694055)	1/20/2013 12:44:19 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1576434

Something run by liberals ... nah, they wouldn't lie.

To: combjelly who wrote (694055)	1/21/2013 3:22:04 PM
From: Bilow	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576434

Hi combjelly; Re: "Ok. So you are down with the idea that the school [where Obama's kids go] is lying about [having armed security officers]." No. They're not lying. They're saying that "their security officers" do not have guns. Here's their statement, as quoted all over the web: “Sidwell Friends security officers do not carry guns.” Is a Secret Service officer a "Sidwell Friends security officer"? No. The Secret Service are not Sidwell Friends security officers. Nor is it the business of Sidwell as to whether or not the Secret Service officers carry weapons. If you want to know the answer to that question, ask the Secret Service. So they're telling the truth in the usual way that lawyers do. And they're telling it in a way to make the political opposition look bad. The upshot is that Obama's kids are protected by armed security personnel, just as the NRA says. -- Carl