Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Technical Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (2695)	1/20/2013 3:47:18 PM
From: Beam	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14245

Yes, the official government conspiracy theory demands we suspend our disbelief as the twin towers, black smoke streaming out signalling oxygen-starved fires, suddenly, after barely an hour, explode with a violent volcanic-like pyroclastic flow, shooting huge metal beams out laterally hundreds of yards at 60-mph, while the towers collapse symmetrically straight through their path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall speed. Later that day, WTC building 7 would also suddenly explode and collapse symmetrically (after several witnesses hear a countdown) and like the other towers, this 49-story building also collapses through its path of most resistance at free-fall speed, into its own footprint -- due, they claim, because of scattered office fires. It looked exactly like a controlled demolition -- supported by testimony from over 300 first responders, police and firemen -- all reported hearing secondary explosions and seeing bright flashes ringing the structures. But did the government's official 9-11 report find any evidence at all of pre planted explosives? Why no -- they didn't bother to test for that. Why should they just because it looked like a controlled demolition to all the newscasters and witnesses that day -- and to all the other people who saw these three steel-frame buildings make history as the very first and only steel-frame buildings on earth to ever collapse due to fire -- as proposed by NIST using junk computer simulations. But we're the conspiracy nuts? Let's just go invade Iraq, which had absolutely nothing to do with the attack, and take away their non-existent weapons of mass destruction. Yeah, that's what we should do -- even though the alleged hijackers were all Saudis. It'll only cost us a couple of trillion dollars -- but what they heck.

To: Metacomet who wrote (2695)	1/23/2013 7:48:25 PM
From: The1Stockman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14245

Thank you Metacomet, ... and Beam, ... Ive posted several articles and videos regarding this issue, especially of the pentagon and #7, ... this just reinforces my view and all my opinions, ... Like I've been saying, ... all these politicians are CROOKS, ... its NOT limited to one side of the Isle, ... they juggle everything together and make it look like they hate each other as they, ... separate US! ... so anyone that comes here supporting one party or the other should know that the battle is not LEFT against RIGHT, ... the battle is about the "Constitution". The day I realized that we where going to stay in Iraq and AFPAK indefinitely was probably the day I lost respect for this government. Its all about Money, ... and the Banks run the SHOW! ... how many times have we been told that Money is Power, ... and we all know that Power is CONTROL. Interesting group of articles, ... thanks again! ~BUMP~ corbettreport.com