Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (694389)	1/21/2013 2:36:25 PM
From: Bonefish	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575913

Where does it say he primarily used the rifle? I thought he left in in the trunk.

To: combjelly who wrote (694389)	1/21/2013 2:36:46 PM
From: d[-_-]b	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575913

He was legal to use the rifle and shotgun for lawful purposes outside the home - so yes he could have gone to a gun range or hunting. He could even use the handguns inside the house to defend himself, but outside the house he can not. He was not the legal owner of any of the guns and he used them without the owners knowledge or permission and used them in an unlawful manner. He stole them. I understand in your socialist mindset all property in a house is owned by the collective family - but in the legal system and especially with regard to firearms - it's theft.