SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (694544)1/21/2013 8:41:32 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575120
 
>Let's get one thing straight. The soft drink industry is NOT a "predatory industry."

You kidding? We're talking about the same companies that have been buying up public water supplies all over the country. These people are deliberately trying to hook people on products that aren't good for us.

>If I feel like having a 32oz drink, I want to get a 32oz drink, not two 16oz drinks. Kind of stupid to have to do that if, for example, I want to watch a long movie like The Hobbit and there is only one cupholder available to me.

OMG, you might have to walk out to get another. Or get a diet soda.

>Frappacinos from Starbucks have lots of calories. Why not ban them as well?

They might limit the sizes, but they won't ban them.

Whatever. I'm not dying on this hill, so to speak. It isn't really my issue. But if I see obesity falling, I'll cheer it along.

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (694544)1/21/2013 8:41:45 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 1575120
 
They should ban those fruit drinks in the machines in schools - talk about calories.

Nurses use orange juice to revive diabetics with low blood sugar.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (694544)1/22/2013 12:28:38 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1575120
 
<<The soft drink industry is NOT a "predatory industry.">>

It is when you consider children.