SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (98281)1/25/2013 3:11:53 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217771
 
Had to run out... heard that on the biz news.. looks like fun :O)

You must have one eye on AAPL :O)



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (98281)1/25/2013 4:04:34 PM
From: Jo Ellen T  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217771
 
Cramer just tweeted that he is going to talk about Ackman and Icahn tonight on his show. Pretty nasty business.

How ya doing Marsh ?

JE



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (98281)1/25/2013 6:45:49 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217771
 
exodus, and so it starts thelocal.ch for the early adopters

dipardieu to russia
sarkozy to britain
whomever to belgium
plenty of folks to singapore
lots of people to hong kong
and now, tina turner to switzerland



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (98281)1/26/2013 5:33:27 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217771
 
just cleared from tray

From: M
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:38 AM
Subject: RE: Comments - Week of January 21

TRUE OR FALSE: QUIZ ON OWNERSHIP OF TREASURY SECURITIES

1. Marketable Treasury debt exceeds the size of the U.S. economy.

2. China owns more Treasurys than the Federal Reserve.

3. Over the past year, China’s ownership share of Treasurys has declined.

4. Since 1998, China’s ownership share of Treasurys has increased 10-fold.

5. China owns more Treasurys than Japan.

6. Excluding China and Japan, foreign investors own more Treasurys than any other group.

7. Foreign investors own more Treasurys than domestic investors.

8. Banks and other financial institutions own more Treasurys than the Fed.

9. As a percentage of Treasurys outstanding, the Fed owns more Treasurys today than it

did prior to the financial crisis.

10. Over the past ten years, households’ share of Treasury ownership has been little changed.


From: M
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:41 AM
Subject: RE: Comments - Week of January 21


ANSWERS to previous email…..

1. False. Publicly held federal debt is 71% of GDP. Gross federal debt, however, tops 100%.

2. False. Despite presidential campaign rhetoric, the Fed currently owns significantly more Treasurys than does China, as shown on the charts.

3. True. It has fallen from a peak of 13.5% in Q2 2011 to 10.3% in Q3 2012.

4. False. Tricky question. It increased 11-fold from 1998 to 2011 but has declined to roughly 8-times at this time.

5. True. But only since 2008 and maybe not for much longer.
The latest TIC report shows a difference of $37 billion. But with China’s ownership flattening out and Japan’s likely to increase if the BoJ buys foreign bonds, the two will likely cross this year.

6. True. Although China and Japan own 20% of the Treasurys, all other foreign investors own 28%.

7. False. Another tricky question. According to the flow of funds data, foreign investors own 48% of Treasurys. But the TIC data shows foreign investors own slightly more than half. Take your pick.

8. True. Financial institutions own nearly 9 percentage points more than the Fed.

9. False. When Bernanke mentioned this at the December 12 press conference, we didn’t believe it either. Puts things in a different perspective and maybe explains why the Fed isn’t so worried about the size of its balance sheet and potentially disrupting the financial markets.

10. True. Households’ ownership share of Treasurys declined from over 20% in 1998 to more than 7% in 2002. It’s about a point higher today.


From: J
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: Comments - Week of January 21


re TRUE OR FALSE: QUIZ ON OWNERSHIP OF TREASURY SECURITIES
for own purpose, i did scoring, red i got wrong and must pay attention unless otherwise deliberated, and green i got correct and w/i expectations

1. Marketable Treasury debt exceeds the size of the U.S. economy.
1. False. Publicly held federal debt is 71% of GDP. Gross federal debt, however, tops 100%. (J: am not troubled as I misunderstood the fine line)


2. China owns more Treasurys than the Federal Reserve.
2. False. Despite presidential campaign rhetoric, the Fed currently owns significantly more Treasurys than does China, as shown on the charts. (J: yeup, china is not stupid)

3. Over the past year, China’s ownership share of Treasurys has declined.
3. True. It has fallen from a peak of 13.5% in Q2 2011 to 10.3% in Q3 2012. (J: yeup, china is not stupid)

4. Since 1998, China’s ownership share of Treasurys has increased 10-fold.
4. False. Tricky question. It increased 11-fold from 1998 to 2011 but has declined to roughly 8-times at this time. (J: okay, but am not fussed w/ the detail)

5. China owns more Treasurys than Japan.
5. True. But only since 2008 and maybe not for much longer. The latest TIC report shows a difference of $37 billion. But with China’s ownership flattening out and Japan’s likely to increase if the BoJ buys foreign bonds, the two will likely cross this year. (J: I still think Japan owns more, but hey, no biggie)

6. Excluding China and Japan, foreign investors own more Treasurys than any other group.
6. True. Although China and Japan own 20% of the Treasurys, all other foreign investors own 28%. (J: whew, good, there is still time until the definitive crisis - the dollar crisis)


7. Foreign investors own more Treasurys than domestic investors.
7. False. Another tricky question. According to the flow of funds data, foreign investors own 48% of Treasurys. But the TIC data shows foreign investors own slightly more than half. Take your pick. (J: good, like the balance. means there is still time)

8. Banks and other financial institutions own more Treasurys than the Fed.
8. True. Financial institutions own nearly 9 percentage points more than the Fed. (J: yeup, but they are one and the same and same and one)


9. As a percentage of Treasurys outstanding, the Fed owns more Treasurys today than it did prior to the financial crisis.
9. False. When Bernanke mentioned this at the December 12 press conference, we didn’t believe it either. Puts things in a different perspective and maybe explains why the Fed isn’t so worried about the size of its balance sheet and potentially disrupting the financial markets. (J: think it depends on whether one treats the fed and the banks as one and the same, and from 10k kilometers away, they are one when genuine push becomes true shove)


10. Over the past ten years, households’ share of Treasury ownership has been little changed.
10. True. Households’ ownership share of Treasurys declined from over 20% in 1998 to more than 7% in 2002. It’s about a point higher today. (J: yeup, unless one treats the household, pension plans, insurance companies, banks, and the fed as one big ponzi game that is)



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (98281)1/27/2013 7:51:13 AM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217771
 
hello 2mar$, today's report: mining is simple and complicated

the equipment involved in australia seems rudimentary, not substantially different from jack's toys, but just bigger

the planning / logistics, while seemingly complicated, may be intuitive, and only require basic math to deal with.

the mills remind me much of mad max movie sets.

gold mining in australia seem really simple - just dig for cash.

(1) our queensland gold mining operation just started, but really only dozer-ing dumps, loading road trains, and putting on pads stuff we shall process as and when we have enough to keep the mill busy through the rainy season when we may have to stop with the dumps transport

(i) the queensland mill is ready now, and can start operations as soon as having enough dumps on the pad so as to keep operation continuous

(ii) we have enough oxide and sulfide dumps here, there and everywhere to keep ourselves busy for several years, first with the oxide, and once the sulfide circuit is read, say in 9-12 months, then sulfide. as the sulfide ore is generally of significantly higher grade, we may wish to accelerate the program even as the oxide ore processing can be kept going for a good long time.

(iii) shall have off site biz planning session immediate after chinese lunar new year's break so as to stop w/ flying blind / dead-reckoning

(iv) even as we are moving oxide dumps, and checking sulfide dumps, we are drilling where the ancients had earlier mined, to check on grades of never mined sulfide resources and once mined oxide goodies

(v) we are checking out to buy a second hand sulfide mill / circuit at 1/5 of original new value, move it for another 1/5 of new value, and reinstall for a third 1/5 of original new value.

the prospective savings is one attraction. the accelerated timing to readiness is more of an attraction.

(2) we have paid option money on a third project, this one located in tasmania, intending to take down the project on own capacity. australia mining assets really have been trashed.

the project is a tailings project w/ its own mill but the shuttered mine is a lead and zinc beast, and the associated mill not very useful for gold.

(i) we are only interested in environmental protection good work. we do not intend to mine for anything.

(ii) we intend to clean up the tailing pond and squish out the last drops of gold goodness and silver fineness out of tailings resulted from eons of lead and zinc extraction

(iii) the gold mill we shall put in will take 18 months to ready, and then be kept busy for 10 years

(3) we may have found a jv partner for our second project, located in ... let me see ... new south wales.

the gold and antimony mine and mill that can be operational w/i 12 months, firstly outputting concentrates, and then, 6 additional months later, put out metals

(i) china supplies 80% of world's antimony
(ii) we may well become the world's largest antimony resource / metals supplier outside of china
(iii) we may work with central asian refugees originally based in london and now relocated to hong kong
(iv) do not know until we know, until the drop-dead date of february 4th and the moment of truth
(v) we may walk if the terms are wrong, because a bad structure would be fatal

(4) below are some recent pics of our queensland operation.