Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Triffin who wrote (176161)	1/28/2013 10:26:34 AM
From: Bearcatbob	Respond to of 206367

What we are going to see is the current import terminals converted to export terminals so that the capital investment can be recovered. If the plants are not allowed to convert their investment capital will simply be confiscated by the "renter" someone wrote about earlier. Bob

To: Triffin who wrote (176161)	1/28/2013 10:34:38 AM
From: Dennis Roth	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206367

IMO, we will see with LNG export terminals what we saw with LNG import terminals, many more projects proposed than will ever be built. At one time there were more than 30 LNG import terminals proposed but only a handful of new terminals were ever built and even fewer needed. With export terminals we will see the same thing, much proposed but little actually coming to fruition. In British Columbia, for example, four LNG export projects are proposed and I expect at least one will be built, but not all four. That said, Elba Island has the advantage of having fewer sailing days to European markets than the Gulf Coast terminals (but not as few as Cove Point) and reuses an existing permitted facility with storage tanks, sea berths, and pipeline connections in place.