Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (152199)	1/29/2013 1:46:13 PM
From: grusum	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224745

That is why their court cases have been thrown out because they cannot prove their assertions. no, they've been thrown out because there are too many commie, liberal-activist, poor-excuse-for judges.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (152199)	1/29/2013 2:47:59 PM
From: lorne	4 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 224745

philips..."lorne, Obama does not have to prove anything. The burden of proof is on those who question his citizenship. That is why their court cases have been thrown out because they cannot prove their assertions.".... Why did hussein seal all his records by executive order??????????????????????????????????????????? How can anyone prove their cases if liberal judges continue to refuse to hear or to let any of the cases to proceed??????????????????????????????????????????????????? There is a lot of proof that hussein is lying...I understand why someone like hussein hates America but why do you hate America... Would you have been successful in a country ruled by a dictator like hussein is trying to be.????

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (152199)	1/29/2013 3:48:49 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224745

Remember Obama's tax hikes on the rich to pay debt? He's already spent every penny It's a good thing our federal government is going on a strict spending diet to curb its out-of-control borrowing. Otherwise, the latest piece of spending legislation passed Monday worth more than $50 billion might have been substantial. Good grief! Remember -- how can any of us forget? -- that long, hard fight President Obama just staged to squeeze more taxes out of wealthy Americans? The top 2% wealthiest already pay 45% of the taxes. But Democrat Obama felt they needed to pay their "fair share," despite the risks that new taxation presents to creating real jobs for the rest of us, Obama already being employed for the next 1,452 days. But who's counting? The Real Big Spender is off to Las Vegas this morning for a $1.5 million-plus photo op day-trip to sell his immigration reform ideas to a select audience that already likes it. For weeks Obama traveled the country telling anyone who would listen and some who'd rather not that he's so absolutely positively determined to cut America's $16.4 trillion national debt that he did so much to grow. And he was insistent on milking money from the rich to do just that. Well, guess what? That $50.4 billion spending bill for, among other things Hurricane Sandy aid, just ate up every single penny of that tax hike for this year, plus another $10 billion. That will go on the debt tab that the $40 billion in new taxes were supposed to start trimming slightly this fiscal year. Obama is so happy about this new spending that he issued a special statement. Of course, he whined that the spending took so long -- Wow, almost an entire month since the Republican House hesitated and then the Senate had to fight over filibusters. But Obama promised that he would sign the bill "as soon as it hits my desk." The three governors of New Jersey, New York and Connecticut -- all Democrats, although Chris Christie used to feign conservatism -- issued a joint statement, also complaining about Washington legislators thinking twice about spending that much of China's money. They did express appreciation for the charity and especially thanked their congressional delegations for their "tenacious efforts" to get the money for the populous Democrat Northeast to rebuild. Now, everyone sympathizes with those impacted by Sandy's devastation. And a growing number also sympathize with the pathetic response of Obama's FEMA, although for some reason the media was quicker to pick up on FEMA's Katrina failures under President Bush. Read More At IBD: news.investors.com

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (152199)	1/29/2013 5:41:58 PM
From: Farmboy	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224745

Does the Social Security administration have to prove a subject isn't married, when the subject is filing for spousal based SS benefits? Or is the burden on the subject to prove lawful marriage?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (152199)	1/29/2013 8:07:32 PM
From: Jack of All Trades	7 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224745

Lots of people have asked. You should ask yourself why he has chosen to seal his records? And since he can no longer be elected again, maybe he should unseal them if he has nothing to hide.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (152199)	1/29/2013 11:58:35 PM
From: Paul V.	Respond to of 224745

Kenneth, Just think with our Republic and Democratic and Judicial Process would be like if these types of extremist radicals would possibly be called for a jury trial. Just think if you had them to select from in a jury pool. <gg> And these are the types who would possibly want to declare that an individual is innocent until proven guilt. Or, would they? That thought is scary!!!!! Hell, as an attorney you might as well have a continuous "objection" in place with the Judge. :) They would never be able to counter the "probable cause" rule!!