SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (696117)1/30/2013 2:12:40 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 1573062
 
The indication, he explained, is that “CO2 is not nearly as strong a climate driver as the IPCC has been assuming.”

That's bad news - right? :-)



To: longnshort who wrote (696117)1/30/2013 9:08:24 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1573062
 
Wow. They made some predictions that were off. Your source conveniently ignores another place where their models were off, sea level is rising about twice as fast as predicted. A rational conclusion is that they aren't accounting for ocean currents properly. Because it is pretty obvious the poles are heating up faster than anticipated. This is born out by measurements.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News