Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (45023)	1/31/2013 11:17:14 AM
From: Fintas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220939

It's not about being correct. It's about what one sees or doesn't see. What I find during discussions is that when things are going down, many don't want to see the reasons WHY it is hard to hit numbers that are NOT realistic. Ditto when going UP one has to be objective as to % I try to present ex for the common sense side of things. Sometimes it can very basic. EX. I'm going to lose 50lbs in a week. HMM are you expecting to run into a ban saw and lose a few body parts. OR I'm 63 and I'm going to put on 40 lbs of muscle in 3 weeks. HMMM oh really, are you getting implants Those numbers down I presented are NOT impossible. In fact they are very possible if one uses the many tools to back test. Just as APPLE 448 was probable from the 700's. It was there for those who looked at it objectively whether using waves or percentages, strings or a FA. However ya got to remove the scales from one's eyes and pre conditioned views from ones mind. IMHO FIntas