SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (32869)2/1/2013 8:47:41 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
all the major programs for the Common Ancestry/ Tree of Life & Evolution include the hypothesis that life self assembled at an early stage in the primordial soup.

Wrong. Evolutionists often claim, though they don't mean it, that evolution doesn't address the origin of life because they realize there's no explanation in evolution for it. Thanks for showing no one takes that seriously.

You also stupidly said there wasn't enough time for this to happen, when in fact there obviously was for life exists which is dated back 3.5billion yrs now.

That wasn't stupid of me to say .... the origin of life at 3.5B ya pushes it back to the beginning of the period the earth's crust was stable enough to support life ... iow there was relatively little time between the stabilization of earth and the origin of life. Your simple mind is just mesmerized by that big number, not realizing 3.5B yrs reduces the time available for life to begin.

Then you go on with other sullied arguments about why aren't we seeing life emergence happening today after all the cycle changes to the earth since ie: atmosphere gas concentrations, changes in oceanic composition that was before the Great Oxidation Event happened 2,400mil yrs ago. (give or take a million)

That would if anything make it easier, if spontaneous generation was possible at all.

Now why would there be all these corroborating cycles & epochs that we can prove by geology that perfectly lend to an emergent changing environment due to living organisms? You are an idiot if you cant comprehend this long stretch of staged eras.

None of this has anything to do with the origin of life in the first place.