Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (32877)	2/2/2013 6:10:03 AM
From: 2MAR$	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

An incredible statement of blind faith. As incredible as finding a laptop computer sitting on a beach picnic table and deciding it and it's programming had self-assembled. Not blind faith at all, that is all you have in a twinkle~twinkle little star cosmology, in just the first micro moments of time we percieve the first self assembly of nuclei happening , even if it only happened just once in all eternity we see that self assembly & bonding not stopping there. Who are you to pronounce what is possible & what is poentially possible, we have been down that old rodeo ciruit many times before. Also have always been struck by the odd irony that religious apologists such as yourself would always resort to the sardonic use of an attribute of their own condition "blind faith" as a way to point out the weakness of the human inquiry we call science. I came upon this irony naturally & arose in me without having to go to some secular website to memorize it, somethings are just obvious & self explanatory within the realm of humrous observation of human nature.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (32877)	2/2/2013 6:14:51 AM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Look around you. Indeed , look around you.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (32877)	2/2/2013 6:35:08 AM
From: 2MAR$	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 69300

An incredible statement of blind faith What is more naive & childlike is introducing an analogy that doesn't inform us of anything on any scientific/meaningful level or leads to new stored data, testable interpretations & further discovery. What is blindly ignored here by you are the many instances of discovery in the past of the same seemingly miraculous possibilities existing. What was discovered as true about the world which was unseen and not to be believed, which could not even be imagined or even dreamed of, proving to be true time & time again. There has been the invention of the most refined tools that have allowed us to peer further into complete new worlds of the very small and extend our view into the very large with corresponding measurement of time in units commensurate with each. And just in that understanding of that almost miraculous ability to produce those precise measurements have revealed limits which would constrain even the greatest God imaginable , render them powerless given the vast distances of time & space . Do you need examples of these seemingly miraculous discoveries thought impossibe that were never even dreamed of before but became the norm of our understanding now? There are many you know & will be many more but what you offer as an alternative is an uniformative tautology of *something from nothing* which you admitedly know to be true but divisively deny.