To: Maurice Winn who wrote (98480 ) 2/2/2013 3:04:10 PM From: GPS Info Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217544 Why on Earth would "the Asian giant" want to do anything about it other than increase the pace that the cheap labour supply runs out? I always wonder if having a discussion with you will yield anything useful, but my hope springs eternal.<g> I think that the underlying assumption is that that was the only way that China progressed to this point was by using cheap labor to export cheap products. The other side of the assumption is that they will have much harder time paying high wages and exporting expensive products. Supporting higher wages (may) involve(s) having a more "western" approach based on freedom and (intellectual) property rights as described in the Zerohedge article: The first is that you may well be building the wrong thing. Becoming a very specialized cog in the global manufacturing system, in this particular way, doesn’t quite seem to set you up for the transition to a knowledge society, perhaps because all you’ve had to do, to get to this point, is solve a bunch of engineering problems. You’ve got the external trappings of modernity – without a Parliament, or real laws, or a Newton, or independent universities, or genuine newspapers, or a working system for the protection of patents and other kinds of intellectual property, or any of the other vital organs of a real modern society… Because those things take a little longer to develop, and require a somewhat different political system. So there’s a transition needed, at this point, to another, rather dissimilar kind of society, and many new opportunities for failure, or very qualified success, along the way. Viewed from the mentality of people who enjoy having slaves, it's disappointing, but decent people would be pleased to have a vast horde of poverty alleviated. That's true, but not the central point. The question for me is how to get unskilled labor educated within a supportive social structure to justify higher wages.