To: Francis Muir who wrote (38392 ) 12/3/1997 9:23:00 PM From: Gary Wisdom Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
Here's the correct trading information from Fido's misleading post. I personally resent those posting information on this thread that is inaccurate and could possibly cause others on the thread to make a decision based on it. So, I have put the CORRECT volume numbers next to the "guesstimates" from Fido below. I will not do this again. Should you prefer Fido's analysis over mine, from now on, you're on your own. I will continue to post for those of you that emailed me requesting me to do so. From Fido: For those who don't have access to DLJdirect here are my readings of their 5-min chart for IOM today. The prices may be out by 1/32 and the volumes are as I read them to the nearest 5,000. I see a gradual increase in volume from almost nothing in the first period beginning 200 pm, to 90,000 and 95,000 in the two periods straddling 300 pm. With this increase in volume I see a fall in the price from 31 9/16 to 31 even. ************************************************************** Following approximate from the DLJdirect 5 min averages time is start of 5 minute period. volume is in thousands to nearest 5,000. price in $ to nearest 1/16. time vol Correct vol price Correct price 200 00 1436200 31 9/16 31.625 205 20 1471000 31 9/16 31.5625 210 30 31 1/2 215 35 1505900 31 1/2 31.50 220 15 31 1/2 225 25 1543900 31 3/8 31.375 230 15 1572100 31 3/8 31.3125 235 50 1611500 31 1/8 31.1875 240 40 1642400 31 1/16 31.0625 245 40 1693200 31 1/8 31.0625 250 55 1733300 31 1/16 31.00 255 90 1773100 2:53 31 -- 31.00 300 95 1983500 3:00 31 3/16 31.0625 305 25 2049900 3:04 31 -- 31.125 310 60 2072000 3:08 31 -- 31.0625 ************************************************* What Francis is not saying is that he is guessing from the DLJ chart. I don't guess when I post volume, I post exact volume. Thus, once again, I stand by my earlier post on the trading activity. "nuff said"