Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Investing in Real Estate - Creative Opportunities -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Vosilla who wrote (1301)	2/6/2013 6:47:51 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 2722

People manage one way or the other.........not that the living is easy Seems much harder to get ahead for the average Joe there now than ever before. Just a very different world than places where cost of living are still reasonable.. Well population growth has slowed in CA.......then again it has nearly 40 million people.........and in migration from east of the Rockies has pretty much dried up. So the higher cost of living is having an impact.

To: John Vosilla who wrote (1301)	2/9/2013 9:53:55 PM
From: John Vosilla	1 Recommendation Respond to of 2722

Better to move to a less expensive area near a major metro area than some small backward low cost town with limited job opportunities. You seem to have those in California these days and you don't have to go to a ghetto, barrio or telecommute from Boise like during the bubble.... In FL there are some fabulous buys under $50k in suburbs of the Tampa area. If you saw pics of these old ranch 'shacks' they look a lot like the $500k+ ones you see in Torrance