Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (697629)	2/6/2013 6:29:19 PM
From: Bilow	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575775

Hi combjelly; Thanks, you've made my day. You are such a loser. Your first link is broken. And your second link supports my point. Clearly you didn't read it. I don't think you thought I would read it either, LOL. I don't think you're going to start reading the peer reviewed literature any time soon. But for the benefit of those on the thread who need a good belly laugh, here's some quotes from your one good link: "To determine this acceleration, we analyze monthly-averaged records for 57 U.S. tide gauges in the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) data base that have lengths of 60–156 years. Least-squares quadratic analysis of each of the 57 records are performed to quantify accelerations, and 25 gauge records having data spanning from 1930 to 2010 are analyzed. In both cases we obtain small average sea-level decelerations. To compare these results with worldwide data, we extend the analysis of Douglas (1992) by an additional 25 years and analyze revised data of Church and White (2006) from 1930 to 2007 and also obtain small sea-level decelerations similar to those we obtain from U.S. gauge records." "When viewed in this historical perspective, the altimeter measurements appear similar to several decadal oscillations over the past 100 years, and it is not possible to determine if the increased trend measured by the altimeters is the leading edge of acceleration or merely a typical decadal oscillation; however, the decreasing average suggests an oscillation." Conclusions: "Our analyses do not indicate acceleration in sea level in U.S. tide gauge records during the 20th century. Instead, for each time period we consider, the records show small decelerations that are consistent with a number of earlier studies of worldwide-gauge records. The decelerations that we obtain are opposite in sign and one to two orders of magnitude less than the +0.07 to +0.28 mm/y2 accelerations that are required to reach sea levels predicted for 2100 by Vermeer and Rahmsdorf (2009), Jevrejeva, Moore, and Grinsted (2010), and Grinsted, Moore, and Jevrejeva (2010). Bindoff et al. (2007) note an increase in worldwide temperature from 1906 to 2005 of 0.74uC. It is essential that investigations continue to address why this worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years, and indeed why global sea level has possibly decelerated for at least the last 80 years. Sea-Level Acceleration Based on U.S. Tide Gauges and Extensions of Previous Global-Gauge Analyses Houston and Dean Journal of Coastal Research, 27, 3, 409-417 (May 2011) jcronline.org Now go back to liberal la-la land and leave the science to people who know how to read. The funny thing about this is that the global warming alarmists can't figure out why it is that they always lose public debates. They're funded by billions of dollars from government and the UN but they can't beat opponents who have budgets in the area of a few hundred thousand dollars per year. Here's some ideas: (1) You're a pack of fools. (2) You're afraid of science and technology and only agree with it when it supports your sick ideas. (3) Your arrogance blinds you to your stupidity. --Carl P.S. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! LOL!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!