Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hawkeyefan who wrote (201708)	2/7/2013 10:02:47 AM
From: hawkeyefan	Respond to of 209892

FWIW, I think the wave down for the "4" ended the last week of June rather than the lower low earlier that month. Again, I know that is not the popular view, but it works with the rally into Sept 2012 and the cycles I like to keep.

To: hawkeyefan who wrote (201708)	2/7/2013 10:19:54 AM
From: POKERSAM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

My count doesn't break any rules as far as I know. IMO if your count breaks a cardinal rule it is incorrect. I see no other way to look at it. If your count is incorrect because it breaks a rule then you MUST find another way to look at it. As Sherlock Holmes said to Watson, "Once you have eliminated the impossible whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." Your count must be eliminated because it is impossible. This is one of the real advantages of EWP. By its rules it helps you eliminate the impossible. Of course, I realize that is my opinion. No one has to share it. I have been told I am too strict in my application of EWP. I don't feel that way, however. I might add that the Rules and Guidelines you sighted does have some errors in it. Generally it is correct.