Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (37888)	2/7/2013 6:53:11 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 86356

I think you meant irreverant.

To: Land Shark who wrote (37888)

2/8/2013 5:46:06 PM

From: Maurice Winn

7 Recommendations Respond to of 86356

Do you really think you are making persuasive argument? <To: Brumar89 who wrote (37883) 2/7/2013 6:45:24 PM
From: Land Shark Read Replies (1) of 37908

Irrelevant tripe.
>

If you want people to believe the Global Warming mantra [which changes with the weather - in one year absence of snow is proof of Global Warming, in the next year presence of snow is proof of Global Warming] such argument is counter-productive for you.

When you discuss Global Warming like that, you demonstrate that the Global Warmists really don't have a good case. They are reduced to personal attack, shouting down, bossiness, appeals to authority, and all the other irrelevant and faulty "arguments". They even threaten physical violence, gaol and so on. Which really just shows they are dangerous criminals.

Mqurice