SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edward Boghosian who wrote (149876)2/8/2013 12:39:50 PM
From: Kelly G.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213173
 
Jobs would not have put up with it-I think, unless he felt Einhorn would be a positive. He would of given them a fight
I agree with this but I like how they are handling it better now than "fighting" when there is nothing to fight. I do not see Tim Cook or Apple cowering at all. It is just a more mature way to handle things. They are placating Einhorn by saying we are reviewing all of our options. And, they probably are it is just that we are not privy to what Apple is planning and often we expect them to move quicker on something than they do. (I want my iWatch right now god damn it! ;-)



To: Edward Boghosian who wrote (149876)2/8/2013 3:55:13 PM
From: Doren1 Recommendation  Respond to of 213173
 
> As far as Gore is concerned

1) rich - goes to the best - "parties" and so knows about "FUNding"
2) while not a geek per se, he at least knows the internet isn't tubes
2) knows everyone in Washington, knows who is on which committee, know who runs which bureaucracy, knows which dark restaurants are in favor, and a lot of people owe him favors.

Favors are what makes the world go round in Washington DC.

Its not bad to have Gore on the board.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News