Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (698500)	2/11/2013 10:14:36 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574595

>> unjustified invasion of a nation that had done nothing to us to warrant it. Perhaps you've forgotten, but Iraq repeatedly violated the terms of the cease fire agreements under various UN resolutions, any one of which gave the US the right to go back and finish the job. Iraq had repeatedly targeted and fired on our aircraft, also which were violations of UN resolutions giving the US the right to continue the Gulf War to its logical conclusion, including the removal of Saddam. You might disagree with the justification, but to claim the invasion was not justified and that they had done nothing is simply bullshit. The fact that we had a weak president in the 90s who didn't have the guts to deal with the situation is of no consequence. Saddam should have understood he was dealing with a real president, not the spineless worm that had been elected in '92.