Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (698766)	2/13/2013 11:30:19 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575761

If a person is at risk of being harmed should they be "allowed," by the government, to carry personal protection? Yes, if the risk is abated and not increased for everyone else. The argument I have made and you have ignored all along is that weapons actually increase the risk of intended and unintended harm...particularly on a college campus, where out of control behavior is quite common. Now quit using these silly and obliquely related references and recognize that contraception is not a controlled practice...it has no potential for physical consequence to un-associated citizenry as a gun does when aimed in the wrong direction, or by a drunken student, or by mistake or intentionally to settle a score, or you name it in any number of other harmful circumstances. Al