SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 7:14:06 AM
From: jlallen2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575400
 
What do we tell the families of the unnecessary casualties in Benghazi?



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 10:43:22 AM
From: i-node2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575400
 
>>Cheney was one of this administration's vocal and unrelenting supporters of invading Iraq.

You mean like THESE people:

youtube.com

When you start criticizing THEM let me know you fucking hypocrite.



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:03:41 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
Notorious Islamist militia linked to U.S. ambassador's death back in Benghazi

by GEOFFREY YORK BENGHAZI, LIBYA — The Globe and Mail Friday, Feb. 15 2013
theglobeandmail.com

Five months after the killing of four Americans here ignited a U.S. presidential-election furor, Benghazi’s most notorious Islamist militia is back in town.

Ansar al-Sharia, widely blamed for the murder of ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans in a chaotic assault on the diplomatic mission on Sept. 11, has now taken control of the key western entrance to Libya’s second city – including the highway to the capital, Tripoli.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY Hard-line Islamist militias target Arab Spring countries

Canada also urging citizens to get out of Benghazi because of terror threats

British embassy in Tripoli aware of potential threat against it


Video: Foreigners leave Libya after threat warning

VIDEO Video: Benghazi review finds State Department failures

After an unofficial carve-up of the city among the main Islamist militia groups, Ansar al-Sharia’s militant fighters have become entrenched at the traffic-choked intersection by inspecting trucks, checking for expired medicine, seizing goods and setting up a medical clinic to test foreign migrants for diseases. They are even negotiating with the Interior Ministry on a deal to transfer their detainees to the government.

It’s a dramatic return to influence for the militia group, which was forcibly evicted from Benghazi by angry protesters after the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate.


The highly visible resurgence of Ansar al-Sharia – often reported to have connections to al-Qaeda – is a further sign that Libya’s weakened government is unable to halt the activities of the most extreme Islamist groups, despite their alleged links to political violence and cultural destruction.

A visit to Benghazi this week showed that the western entrance is controlled by a dozen members of Ansar al-Sharia,
backed by pick-up trucks and other vehicles, including one carrying an anti-aircraft gun. Some vehicles were emblazoned with the group’s logo: a black Islamist flag surmounting two crossed Kalashnikov rifles and an open Koran, along with an index finger pointing skyward. “Ansar al-Sharia Patrol,” the signs proclaim in Arabic.

Members of Ansar al-Sharia say they won authority over the western entrance of Benghazi in an agreement with other Islamist militia groups last month.

“I think we’re doing very well,” said Rajab Alaghoury, a shift commander at the checkpoint. “We even sort out conflicts in the area. We are with the people.”

Observers say Ansar al-Sharia is regaining ground in Benghazi by portraying itself as a humanitarian and security organization,
protecting the city from external threats and hazardous goods.

“It’s a sneaky way of infiltrating the government,”
said Fathi Baja, a political scientist in Benghazi who was among the leaders of Libya’s transitional rebel council. “Nobody gave them permission. It’s a tactic for returning to Benghazi. The government doesn’t want a confrontation with them at this time.”

Ansar al-Sharia has denied any involvement in the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound. But U.S. and Libyan officials have often linked the group to the attack, and some of its leaders have acknowledged they were present at the U.S. compound on the night of the assault.

The killings became a major issue in the U.S. election when Republicans accused the Obama administration of neglecting the security threat and falsely describing the incident as a spontaneous protest rather than a deliberate terrorist attack. Several congressional investigations are under way.

The militia fighters have the traditional signs of Islamist militancy: bushy beards, camouflage uniforms and Kalashnikovs. They freely identify themselves as Ansar al-Sharia members and chat proudly about their work at the checkpoint, although they refuse to allow photos.

They pull over passing trucks, inspect their goods, check for expired food or beverages and study the identity documents of suspected illegal migrants. They said their medical clinic is almost completed and will be open later this week. Last year, they adopted the same kind of public-relations strategy by providing security at the city’s main hospital.

“The people know who we are, and how we helped during the revolution, and how we kept the central hospital secure,” Mr. Alaghoury said.

Another militia officer, Abdullah Abdurahman, displayed a crate of confiscated food and medicine at the checkpoint. A closer look at the drug packages, however, showed that many weren’t expiring until April or June of this year.

He also waved a handful of identity documents from suspected illegal migrants – including a Chadian man and an Ethiopian woman who had “escaped from her boss,” he said.

“We catch a lot of illegal immigrants without documents, including Africans and Egyptians.”

He said his group is negotiating a co-operation agreement with Libya’s Interior Ministry, allowing it to transfer detainees to the government. “Our authority is from the people, but we want to be more official, so that we can collaborate with the government.”

Ansar al-Sharia is seen as the most extreme of Benghazi’s militia groups, but most streets and checkpoints in the city are controlled by other Islamist groups that share much of its ideology and its ultraconservative interpretation of Islam.


The reaction among Benghazi’s people is mixed. Some are resentful of the continuing power of Islamist militia groups, others praise the work of Ansar al-Sharia.

“They’re doing a good job on security,” one Benghazi man said. “They are very strict and tough. People are afraid of them because they could easily beat you up and put you in jail. People who smoke hashish and drink alcohol don’t like them.”

Other militias also admire them. “What Ansar al-Sharia is doing is more humanitarian than military,” said Ismail Salabi, a senior leader of Libya Shield, a powerful Islamist militia that controls several checkpoints in Benghazi. “Ansar al-Sharia is Libyan – they are among us.”

Meanwhile, a few kilometres away, the former U.S. diplomatic mission is still in ruins, as it was after the Sept. 11 attack. Its main building, where Mr. Stevens was caught in the firestorm, is littered with broken glass and rubble, wrecked furniture and a smashed chandelier. Its walls are heavily blackened by smoke, the after-effects of which can still be smelled. Some of the ambassador’s clothes are still strewn across his bedroom.

Asked about the attack, Mr. Alaghoury said: “The U.S. consulate had security cameras everywhere. If there is proof we did it, please show us.”

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY Security fears dim Benghazi’s dream of economic revival



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:10:16 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575400
 
Sen. John Kerry,Jan. 23. 2003"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of MASS DESTRUCTION ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of MASS DESTRUCTION is real..."



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:13:58 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:14:55 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"We are in possession of compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:15:32 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:16:24 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:17:20 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:17:43 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:18:30 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:20:28 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy PELOSI (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:20:54 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:21:32 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575400
 
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:22:00 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:22:21 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:22:41 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:23:05 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:23:22 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:23:45 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1575400
 
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002



To: puborectalis who wrote (699170)2/15/2013 11:24:06 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1575400
 
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002