SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (699384)2/16/2013 1:05:31 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1586659
 

Head Start: Reporters Need to Ask the White House the Obvious Question
Jason Richwine

February 16, 2013 at 8:00 am

(0)

A rigorous and large-scale experimental evaluation, conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), finds that the federal Head Start program has essentially no lasting cognitive or behavioral benefits.

The results clearly call into question the federal government’s $8 billion per year commitment to the program.

Far from growing skeptical about Head Start, however, the Obama Administration has proposed increasing funding for it—and, in so doing, even touts the “success” of Head Start and the “historic investments” the Administration has already made in it.

This would seem to spark an obvious question: Why increase funding for a program that doesn’t work?

Surely the mainstream media, in its role as skeptical watchdog and guardian of the public interest, would rush to pose this question to the President or his press secretary. Yet we cannot find this question in the transcript of any White House press briefing.

Perhaps the question has been asked at some point in some other forum, but the HHS study should be a central focus of any debate over Head Start. So far it has not been.

It’s time for reporters covering the White House to start asking pointed questions about Head Start and the other preschool initiatives the President is now proposing.



To: SilentZ who wrote (699384)2/16/2013 1:48:43 PM
From: TopCat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1586659
 
"Stimulus works."

Of course stimulus works......by definition. The argument is what form of stimulus works the best. Directly throwing money at the economy is not the best way. Creating an environment that creates jobs is much better and lasting.



To: SilentZ who wrote (699384)2/17/2013 7:01:02 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1586659
 
They're attacks on your debating techniques and the bullshit you throw into the discussion. The only thing here that strikes home is the endless repetition of the same bullshit for years upon years,

I think he is mimicking Rush. Rush argues this way, to the delight of his listeners. Couple that with the attitude of "as long as you don't give in, you have won" and a tendency to just make shit up, and...