To: Wayners who wrote (153026 ) 2/18/2013 12:36:22 AM From: warren789 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757 Thank you very much for your efforts. If the photo presented by you were really that of WT7 on 9/11, I have to say it looks like a doctored photo and it does not jive at all with real time televised pics of WT7's free-fall collapse. If the photos were genuine, the collapse of WT7 would likely have occurred in an angular manner with the top front portion falling over the bottom portion of the building or even collapsing in an irregular manner. Such a scenario was not observed. What was actually observed was a case of free-fall straight down. It is a well documented fact, both in the US and in Europe, that a fire cannot cause a modern building to collapse, much less in the free-fall manner which was actually observed. Only a controlled demolition by means of explosives (most likely nanothermite) could have caused the collapse with smoke (due to explosives pulverising concrete) puffing out at regular intervals from the sides of the building as it collapsed. Funny, if the photos you presented were genuine why weren't they given the publicity they were due to bolster the government version of 9/11 that fires could cause buildings to collapse. Why has the government been deathly scared of conducting an official inquiry into 9/11 (despite numerous requests from the public to do so) now that more and more people realise that 9/11 was most probably an, or was even a real, inside job? Maybe the photos were created for no reason other than to bolster the faith of believers in the government version of 9/11. Tough luck! However, not to worry. An official request from Middle East countries has been made to the government to conduct an official inquiry into 9/11 to set the record straight ---- that is, Muslims did not perpetrate 9/11. Hopefully, the government will release a definitive statement in the foreseeable future about 9/11. However, don't hold your breath on it. You see, the government has been keeping quiet as in no lo contenderé in a court of law for 12 long years! And so it might simply choose to remain silent a la no lo contenderé for as long as possible.