SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (699819)2/18/2013 9:26:30 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1587765
 
Hi all; An authoritative US military source on what the Iraqis agreed to at the Safwan cease fire, by a US major:

THE OBJECTIVES OF UNITED STATES MILITARY INTERVENTION IN NORTHERN IRAQ BETWEEN OPERATION DESERT STORM AND OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM (1991)

Thesis: MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE

MICHAEL A. SCHIESL, MAJ, USA

...

The cease-fire meeting on March 3 was dominated by American military commanders. The U.S. chose to end the war on Iraqi soil, selecting an Iraqi air base at Safwan for the discussions and signing ceremonies. At the session, General Schwarzkopf told Iraq’s General Sultan Hashim Ahmed that the U.S. delegation would not negotiate but would give him instructions prepared by the UN Security Council for Iraq to fulfill. These orders to Iraq included methods for avoiding accidental military engagements, for exchanging POW’s and giving data on missing soldiers and for locating Iraqi mines planted in battle areas. Once Ahmed agreed, the session adjourned and the preparation of final cease-fire terms began at the United Nations. During March, the UN Security Council determined the terms Iraq had to comply with before economic sanctions would end and peace would be completed.
...
dtic.mil

In short, there was no secret agreement where Iraq agreed to let US planes shoot down any aircraft over most of its territory forever. The agreement was the ones negotiated by the UN which are available to anyone to read. There is no mention of a "no fly zone".

This shouldn't be a surprise. If "Saddam" or "Iraq" had signed such an agreement, Iraq's violation of it would have been used as a justification for the 2003 war.

-- Carl



To: Bilow who wrote (699819)2/18/2013 10:30:57 PM
From: steve harris1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1587765
 
Simple logic to me is the fact that all you have left to argue after being overwhelmed showing you were wrong is to demand the original ceasefire document.

The original sent to you in a FedEx overnight package from the National Archives be sufficient?