Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (699856)	2/19/2013 1:37:12 PM
From: FJB	Respond to of 1587811

Did Obama supporter vote 6 times in 2012? Ohio poll worker target of investigation By Eric Shawn Published February 19, 2013 FoxNews.com Read more: foxnews.com The Obama/Biden lawn sign remains proudly planted in front of Melowese Richardson's Cincinnati home, three months after the presidential election. It seems that President Obama has an especially ardent supporter in the veteran Ohio poll worker. Richardson told a local television station this month that she voted twice last November. She cast an absentee ballot and then voted at the polls as well. "Yes, I voted twice," Richardson told WCPO-TV. "I, after registering thousands of people, certainly wanted my vote to count, so I voted. I voted at the polls." Authorities also are investigating if she voted in the names of four other people, too, for a total of six votes in the 2012 presidential election. Continues...

To: steve harris who wrote (699856)	2/19/2013 5:11:24 PM
From: Bilow	Respond to of 1587811

Hi steve harris; Re: "I would produce the cease fire document signed at Safwan Airfield but you'd claim it was a fraud and would want a chain of custody." Go ahead and copy in what you've got. What I say about it doesn't matter so much. Other people are reading the discussion and they will have opinions about it and maybe those will be different from mine. Right now they're probably thinking that you're bluffing, LOL. The only reference I found to it was that it was "not published". But I've no doubt that if the document spelled out a "no fly zone" it would have been widely published as both Republican and Democrat presidents had every reason to want to justify their no fly zone policy. The thing went on for well over 10 years. If the US makes an agreement with a foreign power, according to our constitution it has to be ratified by the Senate. And according to the Supreme Court such agreements take precedence over the US constitution. So what's up with this agreement being secret? The Safwan agreement was not ratified by the Senate so it can't have the power of law in the US. -- Carl P.S. Or is it that Bilow somehow has control over your ability to make logical arguments? Nah, I think you simply don't have access to the document.