Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Koligman who wrote (2980)	12/4/1997 6:17:00 AM
From: rupert1	Respond to of 6980

John: Thanks for your reply. Bay probably qualifies as a trading and longer hold stock. I will look at AMAT. Vepoc

To: John Koligman who wrote (2980)	12/4/1997 7:56:00 AM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6980

<<Think about it, they let go around 200,000 people!>> Now John, You strike me as a serious sober sort, but I think you overstated the case here. Certainly part of IBM's reduction-in-force was due to businesses they sold (eg. Federal Systems), so it wasn't as if 200,000 folks hit the streets. Just being a stickler for accuracy here. BTW, I suspect I would not be the only one interested in learning if, when, and why you buy back into BAY. There was a post today on the Meltdown thread in which Lynn Segal cited Geraldine Weiss as noting that for the DOW to get back to a more typical 3% dividend yield that the DOW would be somewhere around 4500. Should I rush out to sell my BAY? Regards, Larry