SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (700259)2/21/2013 2:30:30 PM
From: TopCat1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1579681
 
".....federal budget for FY 2013 will be $3.8T"

Budget? What budget?



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (700259)2/21/2013 6:14:50 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1579681
 
Ted, government spending is not dropping. Even with the sequester, the federal budget for FY 2013 will be $3.8T, which is slightly higher than FY 2012.

Your playing right into the hands of your pols. They are telling you what you want to hear and its BS. The truth is gov't spending is dropping as has gov't employment which has been contracting for 4 years now. Its one of the main reasons why this recovery has not be overly strong.

Stop being a patsy for R pols.

The Spending Surge That Never Happened

By Matthew Yglesias

Posted Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2013, at 10:13 AM



People are very interested in partisan politics. Political partisans are very interested in the presidency. The president is an important player in federal budget debates. And thus people are very interested in questions about federal government spending "under Obama." But the national economy doesn't care about why money gets spent or which level of government spends it.

And taken as a whole, consolidated government spending—federal, state, and local—simply hasn't surged. You can take the beginning of the recession or the beginning of the Obama administration or whatever you like as your starting point and it still hasn't happened. Spending continued on essentially the previous trend throughout the official NBER business cycle dates, and then flattened out in a nearly unprecedented way once the economy began.


If you believe that restraining government spending should supercharge private sector economic activity, then you ought to know that since 2010 we've been living through a nearly unprecedented level of public sector spending restraint. Counterfactuals are, of course, hard. Perhaps private sector growth would have been even weaker had public sector spending risen at a more normal level. But an unusually low level of spending growth isn't a policy we might try in the future, it's a policy that we're trying right now and have been trying for the past few years.

slate.com