SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (700533)2/22/2013 8:44:12 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583400
 
The Rape Epidemic in Morsi's Egypt
(My Note: Created and Endorsed by the Obammy Administration)

Tue, February 19, 2013
by:Raymond Ibrahim

radicalislam.org

Since the “Arab Spring” came to Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood assumed power, sexual harassment, abuse and rape of women has skyrocketed. This graph, harassmap.org
which shows an enormous jump in sexual harassment beginning around January 2011 when the Tahrir revolts began, certainly demonstrates as much.

Its findings are supported by any number of reports appearing in both Arabic and Western media, from both Egyptian and foreign women.

Hundreds of Egyptian women recently took to the streets of Tahrir Square to protest the nonstop harassment they must endure whenever they emerge from their homes and onto the streets.

They held slogans like “Silence is unacceptable, my anger will be heard,” and “A safe square for all; Down with sexual harassment.” “Marchers also shouted chants against President Mohamed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood group from which he hails,” wrote Al Ahram Online

The response? More sexual harassment and rapes.

One woman recently appeared on Egyptian TV recounting her horrific experiences. On the program, she appeared shaded, to conceal her identity — less because she felt personal shame or guilt at what happened and more to protect her and her family from further abuses.

She recounted how she saw a Facebook notice that Egyptian women were going to protest the unsafe conditions for women on the Egyptian street and decided to join them on their scheduled march in Tahrir Square on January 25, the anniversary of the revolution. “I did not realize I would become the victim,” she lamented. When it started to get dark, her group heard that “strange looking men” were appearing and that it was best to leave the area.

During some chaos she was lost from her group. One man told her “this way,” pretending to help her to safety — “I was so naïve to believe him!” — only to lead her to a large group of men (she estimated around 50), who proceeded to encircle and rape her.


“This was the first time someone touched me” quietly recounted the former virgin: “Each one of them attacked a part of my body.” Several pinned her down while others pulled off her pants and stripped her naked, gang-raping her for approximately 20 minutes. She explained how she truly thought she was going to die, and kept screaming “I’m dying!” In response, one of her rapists whispered in her ears: “Don’t worry. Take it,” even as the rest called her derogatory names she would not recite on the air.

Considering that in late November last year, when many Egyptians were protesting President Morsi’s Sharia-heavy constitution and the Muslim Brotherhood responded by paying gangs and thugs to rape protesting women in the streets, anecdotes like the above are becoming commonplace.

Indeed, to appreciate the regularization of sexual harassment and rape in Egypt, consider the words of popular Salafi preacher Abu Islam, who openly, and very sarcastically, blamed the victims:

“They tell you women are a red line. They tell you that naked women—who are going to Tahrir Square because they want to be raped—are a red line! And they ask Morsi and the Brotherhood to leave power!”

Abu Islam added that these women activists are going to Tahrir Square not to protest but to be sexually abused because they want to be raped.

“They have no shame, no fear and not even feminism. Practice your feminism, sheikha! It is a legitimate right for you to be a woman,” he said. “And by the way, 90 percent of them are crusaders [i.e. Christian Copts] and the remaining 10 percent are widows who have no one to control them. You see women talking like monsters,” he added.

No doubt some will argue that Abu Islam is just a “radical” who speaks for himself. Yet many more formal bodies made similar observations, including the new Egyptian parliament’s Shura Council’s “human rights committee,” whose members said that women taking part in protests bear the responsibility of being sexually harassed, describing what happens in some demonstrators’ tents as “prostitution.”

Major General Adel Afify, a member of the committee representing the Salafi Asala Party, criticized female protesters, saying that they “know they are among thugs. They should protect themselves before requesting that the Interior Ministry does so. By getting herself involved in such circumstances, the woman has 100 percent responsibility.”

These sentiments are widely shared in Egypt. A study by the Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights said that 98% of foreign female visitors and 83% of Egyptian women have experienced sexual harassment. Sixty-two percent of men admitted to harassing women, while 53% blame women for “bringing it on.”

Even non-Egyptian women are becoming increasingly familiar with this phenomenon. After describing her own personal experiences with sexual harassment in Egypt, Sarah A. Topol asserts that “Sexual harassment — actually, let’s call it what it is — assault — in Egypt is not just common. It’s an epidemic. It inhabits every space in this society, from back alleys to the birthplace of the newest chapter of Egyptian history ... For the 18 days of protest last year, for me, Tahrir Square was a harassment-free zone. I noticed it, everyone did. But as soon as President Hosni Mubarak stepped down, the unity ended and the harassment returned.”

Journalists Sophia Jones and Erin Banco also elaborated on the epidemic of sexual harassment in Egypt:

It’s difficult to write about sexual harassment and assault in Egypt without sounding like Angry White Girls. But as journalists, it is not merely our job to report in such an environment, it is an everyday psychological and sometimes even physical battle. We open our closets in the morning and debate what to wear to lessen the harassment—as if this would help. Even fully veiled women are harassed on Cairo’s streets. As one young Cairo-based female reporter recently remarked, “it’s a f–ked-up reality that we will be touched.”…. Like hundreds of other countries around the world, sexual harassment and assault happens everyday in Egypt. It happens to both Egyptian women and to foreign women. It happens at all times of the day, despite what some may think, at the hands of men — young boys, grown men, police officers, military officers and almost everyone in between.

The journalists then offer an all too familiar story:

Nor is this merely limited to sexual harassment, but it often, under the right circumstances — few witnesses, the availability of dark alleys — culminates into fullblown gang rape. For example, Natasha Smith a young British journalist covering Tahrir Square, was dragged from her male companion into a frenzied mob in the hundreds. “Men began to rip off my clothes,” she wrote on her blog. They “pulled my limbs apart and threw me around. They were scratching and clenching my breasts and forcing their fingers inside me in every possible way … All I could see was leering faces, more and more faces sneering and jeering as I was tossed around like fresh meat among starving lions.”

All this is yet one more example of the true nature of the “Arab Spring.”

See Related article: Brutal Sexual Assault Mars "Celebration" of Morsi's Victory for an account of the assault on CBS's seasoned war reporter Laura Logan as well as a report on the assault of Natasha Smith

Raymond Ibrahim, a Middle East and Islam specialist, is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum. A widely published author, he is best known for his book, The Al Qaeda Reader . Mr. Ibrahim's dual-background—born and raised in the U.S. by Egyptian parents —has provided him with unique advantages to understanding of the Western and Middle Eastern mindsets.

Recent Articles

Saudi Arabia's Interfaith Hypocrisy

Iranian Terror Plots Foiled in Bahrain and Nigeria

Power Struggle in Bahraini Monarchy

Fake 'Freedoms' Mask Rampant Domestic Abuse in Lebanon

credit fubho



To: combjelly who wrote (700533)2/22/2013 9:00:41 PM
From: TopCat2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583400
 
"Well, no. This is not factual. Now, true that about 47% pay no income tax."

Then why is that not factual. Just because of who said it?



To: combjelly who wrote (700533)2/23/2013 10:48:57 AM
From: longnshort5 Recommendations  Respond to of 1583400
 
Most Miserable U.S. Cities Are Surprisingly All Liberal CitiesForbes has put together the most miserable U.S. cities

Economist Arthur Okun developed the original Misery Index in the 1960s. It combines unemployment and inflation (and was 10.2 last year nationally, down from an 18-year high of 12.1 in 2011).

Our look at misery is more localized, and includes unemployment, as well as other things that aggravate people.

This year we examined nine factors for the 200 largest metro areas in the U.S. The metrics include the serious: violent crime, unemployment, foreclosures, taxes (income and property) and home prices. We also include less weighty, but still important quality-of-life issues like commute times and weather.

We tweaked the methodology in this year’s list in response to feedback from readers, dropping our rankings of both pro sports team success and political corruption, since both were based on regional, rather than city-specific data. We also added a new measure—net migration—which we see as a clear gauge of whether or not residents feel a community is worth living in. Detroit, which ranked No. 2 last year, also would have finished No. 1 under the previous methodology (click here for more details about the criteria for the list).

And how’d that turn out?

  • Detroit, MI
  • Flint, MI
  • Rockford, IL
  • Chicago, IL
  • Modesto, CA
  • Vallejo, CA
  • Warren, MI
  • Stockton, CA
  • Lake County, IL
  • New York, NY
  • Toledo, Ohio
  • St. Louis, Mo.
  • Camden, NJ
  • Milwaukee, Wisc
  • Atlantic City, NJ
  • Atlanta, Ga.
  • Cleveland, Oh
  • Poughkeepsie, NY
  • Gary, Ind
  • Youngstown, Oh
  • Every single one of those cities votes overwhelmingly for Democrats. You’re saying “woah, woah, Teach, Atlanta and St. Louis are in states that vote Republican. That means you are a complete and utter liar, and how dare you make this whole story up!!!!1!!!” Ah, but Atlanta is mostly in Fulton County, which voted 64-34% for Obama over Romney. DeKalb County, which includes a tiny bit of Atlanta, voted even higher for Obama over Romney.

    The city of St. Louis, considered independent of a county, voted 82.7-16% for Obama.

    Every single one of these cities is a recipient of massive liberal/Democrat policies and governance. Their citizens are overwhelmingly liberal. The funny (not ha-ha) part is that liberals are abandoning these cities in droves (those that can escape), which is one of the article measurements. And where do they tend to move? Areas that aren’t practicing far left policies and ideas, then these, let’s call them…..a**holes, bring the same Leftists ideas which destroyed the cities they’ve abandoned to other cities.



    To: combjelly who wrote (700533)2/23/2013 11:24:29 AM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1583400
     
    NC group urges hiring private investigators to go after Republicans...

    NC group urges hiring private investigators to go after Republicans...


    Raleigh, N.C. — A strategy memo circulated recently among liberal-leaning groups prescribes "crippling" legislative leaders and Gov. Pat McCrory with bad press and pressure tactics.

    The memo, which was first reported by The Charlotte Observer, details communications strategy, political tactics and polling data that progressive groups can use to push the policy agenda in Raleigh, where Republicans control both the governor's mansion and the legislature.

    According to documents included with the memo and interviews, the strategy outline was produced by Myers Research and Strategic Services for Project New America. It was originally provided to Progress North Carolina, a liberal nonprofit that has aggressively attacked McCrory during the 2012 campaign and his early term in office. Progress North Carolina shared the memo with Blueprint NC, a nonprofit that coordinates the activities of liberal-leaning nonprofits. In turn, Blueprint NC distributed it to its member organizations.

    An electronic version of the memo appears to contain at least three separate documents. One is an email from outgoing Blueprint NC Communications Director Stephanie Bass describing the material and emphasizing that it is "CONFIDENTIAL to Blueprint, so please be careful – share with your boards and appropriate staff, but not the whole world."

    Sean Kosofsky, Blueprint NC's director, said his group did not pay for or commission the research. "We were just forwarding it on," he said.

    The second document is a "talking points memo" that outlines strategies for progressive groups. Policy wins for the political left, the memo said, would likely be defined as "mitigating" legislation, rather than pushing their own agenda items.

    "The most effective way to mitigate the worst legislation is to weaken our opponents' ability to govern by crippling their leaders (McCrory, Tillis, Berger, etc...)" the memo reads, referring to the governor, House Speaker Thom Tillis and Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger.

    The memo goes on to describe a "potential two-year vision" during which the groups would "eviscerate the leadership and weaken their ability to govern."

    The bulk of the document is a poll memo that talks about how to frame opposition to conservative tax and education policies. The survey was conducted between Jan. 29 and Feb. 2.

    Republican strategists and operatives, some of who talked to WRAL News on background, said the memo puts the lie to liberal criticism of groups like Civitas, which are in large part funded by foundations tied to Art Pope, a former legislator who now serves as McCrory's budget director. Several said it showed Democrats didn't want to cooperate with Republicans leaders. "I think it's shameful," said Ray Martin, caucus director for state Senate Republicans. "This is who is in control of the Democratic Party in North Carolina, radical left-wing zealots."

    The memo indicates there are close ties between the liberal groups and the Democratic Party itself. For example, a response to McCrory's State of the State address earlier this week delivered by Rep. Larry Hall, D-Durham, tracked closely with slides from the poll shared by the liberal groups.

    Hall's prepared remarks included this sentence: "Cutting funding for public education is wrong because it hurts our children's ability to succeed and compete for the jobs of the future."

    A slide from the polling memo includes the phrase, "Cutting funding for public education is wrong because it hurts our children's ability to succeed and compete for the jobs of the future."

    Hall could not be reached for comment Thursday evening.

    Casey Wilkinson, chief of staff for the House Democratic Caucus, said the similarities aren't surprising. It is likely, he said, that the polling provided to the left-leaning groups was provided by the same company, or one similar, that the party uses for its research.



    To: combjelly who wrote (700533)2/23/2013 11:38:43 AM
    From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583400
     
    CUOMO MACHINE GOES AFTER STATE WORKER -- FOR TALKING...

    Top Cuomo Aide Delivers Public Rebuke of State Worker Who Talked to the Press

    [LEFTWINGERS DEMAND ABSOLUTE CONTROL OF COMMUNICATION]

    By THOMAS KAPLAN February 21, 2013 NY TIMES
    nytimes.com

    Mike Fayette broke the rules. An engineer at the New York State Transportation Department, he gave an interview to a reporter from The Adirondack Daily Enterprise.


    In the interview, Mr. Fayette praised Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and the transportation workers who had labored to repair roads and bridges washed out by Tropical Storm Irene in 2011. No matter. His supervisors said he had not been authorized to speak to the press, and they moved to fire him; he retired instead and left in February.

    The story might have ended there — strange but small — but for the Cuomo administration’s reaction to an article about it that appeared on Wednesday in The Daily Enterprise.

    On Thursday, livid that an engineer in the Adirondacks was being portrayed as a victim of Mr. Cuomo’s penchant for control, a top aide to the governor, Howard B. Glaser, took to the airwaves. He read aloud Mr. Fayette’s disciplinary history, describing him as a troubled employee who had previously been penalized for having an improper relationship with a subordinate, misusing his work e-mail to send sexually explicit messages and using his state-assigned vehicle for personal errands.

    “It is not the policy of this administration to terminate people solely for improper contact with the press,” said Mr. Glaser, the director of state operations, adding, “If that were the issue here, the only issue, there would not have been a termination.”

    Mr. Fayette, who had worked for the state for 29 years, was stunned. “It’s absolutely outrageous,” he said Thursday. “The governor needs to say, ‘Hey, look, guys, you’re embarrassing me, you’re embarrassing the state, you’re going after this guy like he’s freaking killed somebody.’

    Mr. Fayette said he believed that Mr. Glaser had broken the law by disclosing his record.

    “If anything, someone should be investigating that clown,” Mr. Fayette said. “You can’t do that. That is so over the line it’s not funny.”

    He added, “He’s just daring me to hire an attorney and sue him.”

    Mr. Glaser said all of the information he disclosed on WGDJ-AM, in Albany, had come from a document that was a public record.

    “Some in the press were breathless to fit this incident into a favored narrative about Cuomo administration control of information,” Mr. Glaser wrote in an e-mail. “But the facts turn out to be inconvenient to that tired story line. If reporters had taken the time to get the whole story, a much different picture would have emerged of a quirky but basically routine personnel matter.”

    The case began in August, when a reporter at the newspaper, writing a series of articles on the first anniversary of Tropical Storm Irene, asked to speak to Transportation Department workers.

    A spokeswoman for the department did not respond, according to the newspaper, so the reporter called Mr. Fayette, who was the agency’s resident engineer in Essex County.

    Mr. Fayette, 55, who grew up on a farm near the Canadian border, had worked for the department since college graduation. He agreed to an interview, saying he feared the newspaper would otherwise accuse the department of “blowing off” its request. The resulting article, which was published on Aug. 30 with the headline “ D.O.T. Engineer on Irene: ‘We Were Up for It,’ ” suggested that the department had worked valiantly after the storm.

    Six days later, Mr. Fayette received a letter ordering him to attend a “disciplinary interrogation” in Albany, which he said he later found out was a result of the interview he had granted. He was soon told that the state would seek to fire him; after lining up witnesses, including local elected officials, to vouch for him at a hearing, he decided to retire instead.

    Cuomo administration officials said no one in the governor’s office had known about Mr. Fayette’s case until it was reported in the paper.

    As for the Transportation Department, whose silence in response to an inquiry from a reporter set off the chain of events? Its communications office did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday.



    To: combjelly who wrote (700533)2/23/2013 11:45:43 AM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1583400
     
    ABERCROMBIE to close 50 stores...

    ABERCROMBIE to close 50 stores...