Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (38531)	2/26/2013 11:43:47 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86356

So that's what you're doing? From what I understand the government will tax back some of whatever social security I get.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (38531)	2/26/2013 1:08:10 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

If you are more worried about the SSTF, give it back to the SSTF. Do you actually understand how the SSTF works? Hint: What is the only asset that the SSTF is permitted to invest in? And does that investment represent a debt obligation to the recipient entity? Hawk

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (38531)	2/26/2013 2:14:11 PM
From: Maurice Winn	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86356

That is not the approach the Global Warmist Alarmists take to their own production of CO2: if you are really worried about the debt, you will give your SS back to the general fund. If you are more worried about the SSTF, give it back to the SSTF. If you only pretend to care about the debt, spend it any way you want. Global Warmists take the third option and a flight to Cancun to discuss how terrible CO2 is. Rich irony in their choice of location. They are not worried so they should not be surprised that other people are not either. Mqurice